Execution at Chester
At what is now Barrel Well Hill and was once Gallows Hill in Boughton, stands the obelisk to George Marsh, an outspoken puritan preacher, from Bolton, who was burned at the stake (24 April 1555) on the north side of the road, after being questioned by the Bishop of Chester. The gallows which once stood here, close to the site of St Giles Cemetery is shown in both the Lavaux Map (1745) and earlier maps of Chester going back to that of Braun and Hogenberg (1581).
The Museum of Policing in Cheshire records that on May 9th 1801 "Thompson, Morgan and Clare" were the last felons to be executed at Gallows hill. Accoring to the Museum site, they were executed for burglary. However "Infamous Cheshire" records that while Thompson and Morgan were unpopular forgers who had "cheated and ruined the lives of a number of local people", John Clare had some sympathy because he had committed a relatively minor crime. At his trial, John Clare had shouted that "he would never hang" - technically he did hang, although he drowned first.
After 1801, condemned men (and women) were briefly sent to Northgate Gaol for execution, and later, to the City Gaol. In 1868 public execution was abolished in the UK. In 1866, the County Gaol moved to Knutsford and further executions occurred there until 1912. However there was at least one private execution in Chester, that of James Banister 4th April, 1877. Others, as mentioned in various newspaper sources, are listed below.
When Knutsford was commandeered by the military in 1914, condemned criminals were sent to Walton (Liverpool) or Strangeways (Manchester) for execution. The death penalty was finally, effectively abolished on 9th November 1964. Nevertheless, there remained a working gallows at HMP Wandsworth, London, until 1994, which was tested every six months until 1992. This gallows is now housed in the National Justice Museum in Nottingham.
Why write about executions at Chester? - there are several reasons, one of which is that some of that written elsewhere is quite wrong in the details. Supposed witches were not rolled down Barrel Well Hill in barrels to drown in the river and the number of executions for witchraft (see: Witch Trials) is often stated wrongly. Public executions did not, as is sometimes written, end when they ceased to be performed at Boughton.
This article does not contain an exhaustive list of executions at Chester but mentions some of the more interesting cases. Longer lists of those who were executed at Chester can be found in the links.
Executions and the Amphitheatre?
It is likely that the Romans used the Amphitheatre for executions, but very little is known about these. Excavations at Leicester have led some to suggest that people may have been thrown to lions. Roman law sanctioned the execution of criminals and prisoners of war in the arena through the public spectacle of throwing them to wild beasts; defined by the Latin term "damnatio ad bestias". Otherwise, direct evidence for violent spectacles in Roman Britain is otherwise extraordinarily scarce, a rare exception being the puncture wound inflicted by a large carnivore on the pelvis of a male skeleton from Roman York. A stone block was discovered during excavation at the Amphitheatre and one theory holds that this was used as a tethering point, possibly for those being "thrown to the dogs".
Being a military base, some executions may have been brought about by military dicipline. In Roman Chester the death penalty was a rarely used punishment for desertion, mutiny or insubordination. In cases where execution might be considered, factors such as the soldier's length of service, his rank, previous conduct, age, etc. were taken into account. Special consideration was given to young soldiers. Following a court-martial sentence for desertion or dereliction of duty, the soldier would be stoned, or beaten to death by cudgels, in front of the assembled troops, by his fellow soldiers. This may have been carried out outside the Northgate, as a similar process appears to have been the case elsewhere.
Revolts by the troops in Britain were quite commonplace, usually setting up a brief "British Emperor". However it is not known whether there were significant punishments inflicted on legions which had chosen the "wrong side". Other executions could have been due to religious persecutions. One theory for the extra-mural location of St Johns is that it was built on a site near where early christians were martyred. Post holes of at least a relatively late Roman date have been found within the amphitheatre and there has been some conjecture that these were the location of the supports for a platform possibly used for punishments following a revolt or for religious persecution. They could also be the remains of an early post-roman structure on the site.
In the 1930's excavations near the Amphiteatre uncovered a human jawbone which appeared to show signs of a violent death. This was at first thought to be Roman, but forensic studies in 2016 revealed that it came from the 13th Century, and that the person had most likely been decapitated with a small knife or possibly had his throat cut. It could have been an execution, possibly of a Welsh hostage, or simply a murder.
Early Executions at Gallows Hill
In the Middle-Ages, the legal position of Chester was somewhat peculiar with the jurisdiction being somewhat different to that of what was seen as largely separate England (see: Courts). The Gloverstone standing close to the entrance to Chester Castle was an important boundary marker between the separate jurisdictions of the city and the county. In 1651, the Chester Castle was described as follows:
- "At the first coming in is the Gate-house, which is a prison for the whole County, having divers rooms and lodgings. And hard within the Gate is a house, which was sometime the Exchequer but now the Custom House. Not far from thence in the Base Court is a deep well, and thereby stables, and other Houses of Office. On the left-hand is a chappell and hard by adjoyning thereunto, the goodly fair and large Shire-Hall newly repaired where all matters of Law touching the County Palatine are heard, and judicially determined. And at the end thereof the brave New Exchequer for the said County Palatine. All these are in the Base Court. Then there is a drawbridge into the Inner Ward, wherein are divers goodly Lodgings for the Justices, when they come, and herein the Constable himself dwelleth. The Thieves and Fellons are arraigned in the said Shire-Hall and, being condemned, are by the Constable of the Castle or his Deputy, delivered to the Sheriffs of the City, a certain distance without the Castle-Gate, at a stone called The Glover's Stone from which place the said Sheriffs convey them to the place of execution, called Boughton."
Another sources attests that petty criminals and "vagabonds" were handed over:
- "at glovers stoune to such officer of the Cittie of Chester, in and from hence to whipp them through the the Cittie"
This tradition was still extant in the 19th Century, when it was described by the prison reformer Howard (see: The State of the Prisons in Britain, 1775-1905). Further reference to the "Glover's Stone" in some kind of judicial/administrative context is found in the Diaries of Roger Whitley for October 1686. The citizens of the city of Chester therefore were charged with the excecution of the condemned of the county of Cheshire. Thus, from time immemorial it had been the unpleasant duty of the two Sheriffs of the City of Chester to execute all criminals condemned to death by the Palatine Courts, not only in the City but also in the County; although when the body of any criminal was ordered to be hanged in chains in any part of the County the gibbeting was carried out by the Sheriff of the County.
Just how this peculiar administration of executions came about is not entirely clear and indeed there are some conflicting theories (see the paper by R. Stuart Brown, linked below). The separation of the City and the County date back to at least the "Great Charter" of Henry VII (1506) which constituted the City as a county in its own right, but retained Chester Castle and a small neighbouring area as part of the Palatine County. Another possible start date in at the time of the Black Prince (1320). One possible reason is that the City authorities disliked the County sheriffs having any authority within the City.
The standard execution procedure at Chester was that a clergyman was appointed to accompany the condemned through the city to the "hanging-tree" at Boughton, which was close of the outer limits of the city administration. A spiritual counsellor was supposed to keep the convicted man or woman calm. They were also there to reassure the crowd that any repentance speech was genuine. The clergy had to attempt to bring about a final confession, being duty-bound to persuade the prisoner to atone for murder to cleanse their soul. That confessional was written down and then printed as an intended moral lesson. Due legal process had to be seen to attend to the prisoner’s spiritual needs and protect the well-being of provincial society.
Henry Bradshaw (d.1513) in his Life of St Werburgh tells an unlikely tale of how a man about to be hanged at Chester prayed to the saint to save him. After he had hung for a short while a dove appeared and pecked at the rope, which parted causing the man to fall to the ground. To the shock of those around he then was found to be alive. According to Bradshaw, whose tale becomes even harder to believe, two more attempts to hang him failed for the same reason and he was then permitted to go free.
Some genuine early executions were:
1554: George Marsh burnt at Spital, Boughton. Marsh's execution is covered in detail elsewhere on this site, but was somwwhat botched, with the fire being too small and at one point almost running out of fuel. Mary I ordered hundreds of Protestants burnt at the stake during her reign (1553–58) in what would be known as the "Marian Persecutions" earning her the epithet of "Bloody" Mary;
1558: Sept. 8th. A woman burnt at Boughton for poisoning her husband. Buring at the stake was the traditional punishment for women convicted of treason. There were two types of treason: high treason, for crimes against the sovereign; and petty treason, for the murder of one's lawful superior, including that of a husband by his wife.
1589: John Taylor – Gaoler of Chester Castle. He had been found guilty of the murder of Mr. Hockenhaff, a Catholic prisoner in his custody for recusancy. Taylor would have been executed by the "short drop" method, where the prisoner was stood on a cart, a rope placed around their neck and the cart caused to move away. This did not break the neck and caused death by strangulation which could take several minutes.
1592: William Geaton – servant to the Bishop of Chester – his body hung on chains on Grappenhall Heath. His crime was the murder of James Findlove, a Scottish peddler. "Gibbeting" refers to the use of a gallows-type structure from which the bodies of criminals were hanged on public display to deter other existing or potential criminals. Often this was done at or near the scene of the crime, which may have been some distance from the place of execution. Various gibbets, including the one at Grappenhall Heath, were among the landmarks indicated by John Ogilby in his 1975 set of roadmaps.
1602: Elizabeth Duncalfe who used the poison "Ratbane" in "oatcakes" in an attempt to poison her husband, John Caldwell. The husband was apparently frequently away from home and Elizabeth had taken up with a wealthy farmer, by the name of Jeffrey Bownde. One or the other came up with a plan to dispose of the husband. Bownde had a servant woman, a widow named Isabelle Hall who became involved in the plot. She asked her brother George Fernelly to help, and Bownd offered Fernelly £5 to dispose of his rival. Fernelly happily took the money, but was slow in coming up with the action. Isabelle Hall the came up with another plan. Bownde bought the poison "Ratsbane", at Hall’s behest, in Knutsford and sent it to Elizabeth Caldwell. Ratbane is most likely a reference to arsenic trioxide which is known to cause vomiting. She sent the poison to Hall via a maid, and Hall then baked this into some "oaten cakes". A neighbours child of 6 or 7 came into the house to collect some kindling for their own fire, and John Caldwell gave her some of the cake. She soon became unwell, went home, and there died. Others in the Caldwell house were taken ill, but by vomiting purged themselves of the poison, and their lives were saved, including John Caldwell. It was reported that 2 dogs and a cat ate some of the vomit, and they also died. Elizabeth was taken before three justices of the Peace, Sir John Savage, Sir Thomas Aston, and Master Brooke, where she confessed everything straight away. Her accomplice, Jeffrey Bownde was pressed to death at Chester Castle when he refused to plead. Many defendants charged with capital offences would refuse to plead in order to avoid forfeiture of property. If the defendant pleaded either guilty or not guilty and was executed, their heirs would inherit nothing, their property escheating to the state. If they refused to plead their heirs would inherit their estate, even if they died in the process.
Elizabeth had a friend in Lady Mary Cholmondesly, who petitioned the Court on Elizabeth’s behalf, but the severity of the charges were beyond her help, save that she would be hung rather than burnt.
1602: Arnet servant to Mr Manley of "Saltney Side" hung for the murder of another servant. Hemingway records a list of those executed in Chester in his history of the city and of Arnet writes:
- "1601, At Michaelmas fair, one Arnet, servant to Mr Manly of Saltney side, cruelly murdered one of his fellows near unto his master's house, first by cutting bis throat with a knife and afterwards, missing his windpipe, he ripped up his belly with the same knife so that his bowels fell out, and leaving him for dead went home without taking any money from him as be first intended; the dying man notwithstanding came home wrapping his bowels together in his shirt and lived until he had made known who killed him. The murderer was hanged in chains the year following near to the place where the deed was done."
1673: John Plessington - who shares a monument with George Marsh. See: St Giles Cemetery for more on Plessington and his relics.
1750: Delaney and Johnson for the murder of a companion on the road to Parkgate to take ship for Ireland. They were found guilty, and hanged at Boughton on September 22nd. On the same day, the two bodies were hung up in chains near the Two Mills on the heath. Although it was said locally that the gibbet was made on an ash tree, the Sherrif’s accounts of 1750 show that for the allowance was made for timber and other ironwork for a "strong gibbet thirty six feet high", at a cost of £25 and 5 shillings. Also a charge of £5 5 shillings for "transporting the bodies several miles". Since then Saughall mill has been known locally as The Gibbet Mill.
Dissection
One of the provisions of the Murder Act of 1752 begins with the mandate that “in no case whatsoever shall the body of any murderer be suffered to be buried,” resulting in a strange period of posthumous punishment during which the bodies of murderers were to be hung in chains or dissected after execution. Women were never gibbeted, it would be nice to think that this was out of some kind of respect for the female body but the truth was that female murderers were so rare in comparison with men that their corpses were always claimed for dissection.
The Act had other severe provisions: it stipulated ‘the sentence of death should henceforth be passed upon murderers in open court immediately after conviction’. This shortened the possible window during which appeals or bargaining could occur that might soften the anticipated sentence. Similarly, it required that the execution of those condemned under the Act be carried out two days after sentencing, with the exception that if it should fall on a Sunday the execution would take place on the following day (Monday). The combination of these two clauses meant that punishment would now be much more rapidly inflicted. A further clause directed those convicted of murder to be held in solitary confinement and allowed a diet of only bread and water. The Murder Act’s final clause sought to prevent interference with the punishment of convicted murderers: attempting to rescue the condemned before execution was made punishable by death. The Act also made any attempt to rescue the murderer’s corpse punishable by transportation overseas.
The sentencing of a criminal to post-mortem dissection was not only intended to provide a further mark of infamy to the punishment of death, as made explicit in the wording of the Murder Act, it was also intended to act as a deterrent from crime. Following the passage of the Anatomy Act 1832, which was intended to curb the activity of "body snatchers", it was confirmed that not only were the convicted hung, but they were also sometimes dissected - often in public. Confining the dissections to murderers (and the threat of transportation) had the benefit that in London it substantially ended riots at executions, where a person had been hung for a "minor" offence and their friends and family wanted to bury them. And, in ensuring a legal supply of “subjects” to anatomists, it helped make surgery as swift as possible in an age before reliable anaesthesia. On the other hand, public anatomization of dead killers was so uncommon that it seems likely to have inspired fascination rather than deterrent horror.
The traditional view of the Bloody Code is that the statute had a general clause about executed criminal corpses being subjected to “anatomisation and dissection”. The two terms are elided together as post-mortem punishment in the literature, whereas the contemporary meaning of the medico-legal terminology was more precise. The Greek ἀνατομή (anatomē) means "to cut up" and anatomisation was a rather crude opening-up of the body as a public spectacle.
There were three distinctive penal stages: first, a death penalty (legal death, to be hanged); second, a sentence to be anatomised (medical death) to look at the major organs expiring; and finally, dissection (post-mortem punishment). This medico-penal choreography reflected the material fact that sometimes those executed for homicide did not expire on the gallows. Surgeons acquired bodies that looked lifeless, near-to-death, but were not necessarily clinically deceased. Some of those executed in winter displayed symptoms of extreme hypothermia. The uncomfortable reality was that it was the surgeon, and not the hangman alone, who ensured that the condemned became legally, socially, and medically dead. Contemporaries took the view that that there was space between life and death. Penal surgeons called this critical threshold, the “Name of Death” (dying), and their official role was to ensure that the criminal crossed a fatal medical-death boundary, known as “Absolute Death” (expired). In provincial England, notably in the North and Midlands areas, anatomists checked expiration by applying a cloth dipped in hot water to the face of the corpse. It was conventional to then take a large swan's feather and caress it gently along the neck. If the pupils remained fixed and dilated, most anatomists still double-checked their prognosis. They made a small incision with a lancet at the breast-bone to watch heart and lung failure until visible life-signs ceased. These precautions reflected a popular notion that notorious criminals sometimes had an extra life-force such was their willpower to defy penal punishment.
Section 16 of the Anatomy Act 1832 repealed parts of sections 4 and 5 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1828, which had consolidated several provisions from several earlier statutes and had retained the provision of 1752 that the bodies of murderers were to be hung in chains or dissected after execution. Section 16 provided instead that such bodies were to be either hung in chains or buried within the precincts of the last prison in which the deceased had been confined. The provision for hanging in chains was repealed by the Hanging in Chains Act 1834, and the whole section was repealed and replaced by section 3 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861.
In the provinces the dissection tended to follow a similar pattern. Once inside the designated space, different social classes entered by a timed-ticket entry system. On day one, everyone paraded in long queues to see the body cut open. The amount of viewing time depended on the size of the crowd assembled, how many doors there were to enter and exit, and the general capacity of the chosen venue to process people through in an orderly manner. On day two tickets were sold to the educated elite or professionals. At night, ladies of the middling-sort could then buy a ticket to see a dissection of the eye, which was considered seemly for their sensibilities. They were not permitted to see a naked torso in the way that females of the labouring poor had access to on day one.
With the growth of the teaching of practical anatomy in medical schools the stortage of cadavers continued and eventually the law developed such that those who died in the Workhouse, Asylum, Infirmary or prison without a relative to claim them were subjected to the anatomists saw and scalpel. Being dissected became the fate of the poor in general rather than simply murderers.
Later Executions at Gallows Hill
A peculiar legend is attached to a former inn known as the "Glass House" some distance beyond Boughton going out of Chester. According to this local tale this inn, which stood on the border of the city, was the last place that the condemned could partake of an alcoholic drink before execution. After they had emptied their glass it would be broken so as not to pass bad luck onto another. The tale continues with the elaboration that the bases of the glasses were collected and eventually made into a leaded window (which is said to purchased and "taken away"). The origin of this tale is presumably that someone had a window of decorative "pintel glass" which would have appeared to have been made from the bases of wine-glasses that had been broken off at the foot of the stem, but in-fact is simply how these small lights are made. There is no evidence that anyone was every brought to their execution from the direction of the Glass House.
1763: Mary Heald
A quaker from Tatton near Knutsford, was convicted of the murder of her husband, Samuel. Samuel was a reputable farmer who had penned a testimonial in 1759 regarding an opium-based "miracle cure" his wife had used: "Dr Bateman's Original Pectoral Drops". This document was published in the newspapers and may have brought her some minor local fame. She gained rather more lasting fame a short while later when she put arsenic in his "fleetings", a form of milk curds, and was committed to the castle at Chester, and then found guilty. She was "burnt to death" but strangled first. The Courant newspaper reported the events as follows:
- "Chester, April 26th. In our last issue were mention'd the trial and condemnation of Mary Heald; as also, that the judges had been pleased to respite her execution until Saturday, the 23'd inst. Accordingly, soon after ten of the clock in the forenoon of that day, the sheriffs of Chester, with their attendants, came to Gloverstone [neutral ground between City and Castle, just outside the latter's main gate], where the gaoler of the Castle deliver'd to them the said Mary Heald; who, pursuant to sentence, was drawn from thence in a sledge, through the city to Spital Boughton; where after due time having been allowed for her private devotion, she was affixed to a stake, on the north side of the great road, almost opposite to the gallows: and having been first strangled, faggots, pitch barrels, and other combustibles, were properly placed all around her, and the fire being lighted up, her body was consumed to ashes. This unhappy woman behaved with much decency, and left an authentick written declaration, confessing her crime and expressing much penitence and contrition."
The Assembly Records note the expenses:
- "Upon reading the petition of Sheriffs John Drake and Wm Dicas for 12 pounds,16 shillings and 8 pence expenses for the execution of Mary Heald, who was burned at Spittle Boughton on Saturday 23 April (1763) for the murder (by poisoning) of her husband, which exceeded those normally disbursed by the Sheriffs for the common execution of felons and malefactors, the Treasurer was orderedd to pay the same."
It seems strange to think that the first local newspaper was in circulation before the last "buring at the stake", but she was the last person to be burnt at Chester. Catherine Murphy (died 18 March 1789) also known as Christian Murphy an English counterfeiter, was the last woman in England to be officially burned at the stake. Burning as a method of execution was abolished the next year, by the Treason Act 1790.
1766 saw a whole cluster of hangings at Boughton: Peter Steers, for the murder of his wife, by poison; Edward Holt, for a burglary at Knutsford; Thomas Buckley, age 20, for a burglary at Chester; Thomas Hyde, aged 35, for horse stealing and James Buckley, aged 22, for a burglary in Mrs. Lloyd’s house in Newgate Street, Chester. The Steers case has some features of interest. First, he complained of illness and sought out the services of a surgeon and apothecary in Knutsford, which was some distance from his home while other medical services were available nearer his residence. He told the surgeon (Bellingham) his name was "Heald" (Mary Heald was a noted poisoner just four years earlier) and that he came from Mobberley. Either at the same time, or shortly thereafter, Steers obtained some arsenic from the surgeon. On 20th November he made some "fermaty" for his family and his wife ate only a little of hers as it tasted odd. She still died. Unfortunately Bellingham remembered him and gave evidence against Steers that he had used a false name, obtained arsenic and that his wife had died of it.
1767: William Bostock and Mary Newton
Bostock was a salt boiler from Middlewich, who on the death of his son, took his daughter in law, Sarah, as a housekeeper. Some time later she discovered she was pregnant, and it was then that Bostock was found guilty of poisoning. Sarah’s sister was a chief witness at his trial, and Bostock furiously stated that he would in the short time he had left would "contrive to do for thee". He was hanged at Boughton two days later, and his body given to the surgeons at the relatively new Infirmary for dissection.
Mary was a servant girl who lived with her employers, Mr And Mrs Torkington and their 2 year old son.Mary was convicted of poisoning Ann Torkington, who recovered, and their son, who did not, by putting arsenic in their posset. Mary claimed that John Torkington asked her to buy ‘two pennworth of arsenick’ which he then put into the possett. He told Mary that he would marry her once his wife was dead. John Torkington was also arrested after Mary, and taken to Chester Castle, but there is no record yet of what became of him. Mary was tried and sentenced to death, but on account of being heavily pregnant, the execution was postponed until a month and a day after the birth of the child. She was then hanged. It is not known what happened to her body.
1771: John Chapman
The courtroom facts were that Chapman was a sailor. He was according to some versions convicted of homicide after a port brawl and in others for the robbery of a Martha Hewitt. Throughout the capital hearing he protested his innocence. It was rumoured that the trial evidence that convicted him was decidedly circumstantial. His fellow sailors thought him innocent and were angry at the death-sentence verdict. The following account appeared in the "Annual Register":
- "The following is an account of John Chapman, who was executed here for robbing Martha Hewitt, of this county. At the hour appointed he was conducted to the place of execution by a greater number of constables than usual, as there was some suspicion of a rescue by the vast concourse of sailors (he being one of that profession) that accompanied him. On his setting out, a book was put into his hand by the hangman, which he no sooner received than he threw among his brother shipmates, as he termed them; and they immediately tore it to pieces. A clergyman then got into the cart, and exhorted him to behave with more decency, and to think of his sudden change; but instead of attending to this admonition, he got up in the cart, and (being pinioned) drove his head in the clergyman's belly, and tumbled him out of the cart. After this he flung himself out, and attempted to run into the midst of the sailors, but was prevented by the irons with which he was loaded. He was then seized and tied by ropes in the cart, and in that manner was tied to the fatal tree. At his arrival there he refused either to hear prayers or to pray himself; therefore two men, together with the hangman, attempted to lift him up, to fix the rope about his neck, in doing of which, he by some means got the hangman's thumb in his mouth, which he almost separated from the hand: he was at last tied up, but with great difficulty"
1774: Elizabeth Hyne
According to the Shrewsbury Chronicle:
- "for the wilful Murder of new-born Male Baftard Child, which delivered herfelf of, and immediately cut its Throat."
Infanticide (as a crime) gained both popular and bureaucratic significance in Victorian Britain. By the mid-19th century, in the context of criminal lunacy and the insanity defence, killing one's own child(ren) attracted ferocious debate, as the role of women in society was defined by motherhood, and it was thought that any woman who murdered her own child was by definition insane and could not be held responsible for her actions. Several cases were subsequently highlighted during the Royal Commission on Capital Punishment 1864–66, as a particular felony where an effective avoidance of the death penalty had informally begun.
1776: James Knight
James Knight was convicted of suspicion of stealing a cask of rum valued at £3, and was sentenced to 7 years transportation. With the development of colonies, transportation was introduced as an alternative punishment to execution, although legally it was considered a condition of a pardon, rather than a sentence in itself. However, whilst awaiting his sentence at Chester Castle, there was a breakout – and he was re-captured and sentenced to death, and subsequently executed. Some accounts state that he was executed for murder but this appears not to be the case. Whether the outbreak of the Amercican Revolutionary war (which halted transportation for a few years) had any effect on the sentence is unknown.
1776: Lawless, Hutchinson, Solomon and Josephs
Christopher Lawless. Isaac Hutchinson, Alexander Solomon and Isaac Josephs were executed for robbing the shop of a Mr Pemberton. The museum of policing records that "They were buried behind the Rodney Cop opposite Overleigh", by which is possibly meant the "Roodee Cop".
1777: Samual Thorley
When the dismembered body of Ann Smith, an itinerant ballad singer was found in Howty Brook, which ran through Preisty Fields between Astbury and Congleton, suspicion soon fell upon a local, Samual Thorley. The body parts were recovered and re-assembled in a local barn and it became evident that it was incomplete. Thorley was not the brightest, and had shown a great deal of interest in the search for and finding of the various body parts, and was also a "butcher's follower" (one employed to hack up carcases). He also helped out on occasion as a gravedigger at Ashbury church. On the night of the murder he was seen with his usual bloody apron, and was also wet up to the waist, unusual especially in the cold November weather. Thorley is said to have uttered a local proverb which some say he made famous: when he thought he might be considered a suspect he stated that he would:
- "..go to Leek out of the noise."
He visited a Mrs Oakes, and gave her a piece of meat which he said was pork to cook, and Thorley cooked it himself the following day, although he did not eat it as it appeared to be off, a test had supposedly made him violently ill. Mrs Oakes decided to keep the meat for boiling up for grease, although it was found to be human flesh by a surgeon called in by the local police. Thorley was arrested. There were sufficient doubts about his intelligence at the trial to set a test to see whether he was sufficiently compos mentis to stand trial. Thorley was set to count a score of nails and having succeeded in the task was thought to be a sufficiently competent candidate for the gallows.
At his trial Thorley was asked the question on every body’s lips, why? His reply was almost as chilling as the deed itself:
- "I heard that human flesh tasted like young pig, I wished to find out if this was true."
He was hanged on April 10th 1777, and his body was gibbetted the following day at West Heath, Congleton. This was not without a further grotesque incident as the wagoner who carried the body back to be gibbeted got drunk and lost the body when it fell out of the cart on his way through the Delamere Forest. After a "prolonged" search the body was found and conveyed to Congleton to be strung up once again. He is known as the Congleton Cannibal.
1778: Sarah Sant
Convicted for the murder of her bastard child, she was hanged on 12th September, 1778. Her mother Mary Sant was also tried on the charge of murder and was aquitted; she returned home and hanged herself in her house.
1779: Sarah Jones
Convicted for stealing 28 yards of chintz, from the shop of Mr Meacock, at Chester, and hung.
1784: Elizabeth Wood
She had baked a veal pie for her husband, James Simister, and had been shown to have bought arsenic recently. The body of James Simister was found to have contained a rough powder, which would be proved to be arsenic, according to early tests.
1789: Thomas Mate
Thomas Mate, aged 64 was beating his wife so severely that his wife, her face all bloody, begged her Handbridge neighbours to call for help. Two neighbours went to the Magistrate who immediately sent four constables to the house with a warrant to arrest Thomas Mate. The four had to break in the door, and proceeded to the upstairs room where Mate was. A gun was fired, and Constable John Parry fell to the floor, and within minutes was dead. Mate was convicted of murder, and sentenced to death. On the scaffold he denounced his prosecutors, and blamed his wife for her infidelity, despite her being nearly seventy years of age. He was, according to the Chester Chronicle "a lamentable instance of human depravity".
1790: John Dean
John Dean had returned home very late from the public house, and began to shout at his wife. The lodger, Mary Bell, and the couple’s son began to try to calm the situation, but had to leap from a window to save themselves. Mary fetched Constable Thornley, who went to the house with assistance, and found the victim’s body seemed like ‘one big wound’. A surgeon was called for, but could do nothing to save her; she was found to be pregnant and the surgeon tried a caesarean operation, but the baby was dead also. According to some records John Dean’s body was handed over for dissection after his execution, and his body also ordered to be hung in chains. If both procedures were carried out the result would have been somwhat messy.
1791: William Lowndes
In 1790 the highwayman William Lowndes was incarcerated in Chester Gaol to await trial for attacking post boy James Archer at Great Budworth on 11 March 1788 armed with a pistol and a stake with a nail through the end. He was also suspected of having robbed the mail between Chester and Frodsham on the 20th June 1789:
- "On the llth of April, 1789, about Eleven Weeks previous to the 29th of June, 1789, the Day on which the Mail between Chester and Frodsham was robbed, he went with his Wife and Child to live at Beaumaris in North Wales, assuming the Name of William Hutchinson, and lodged with one Mrs. Corry: In a few Days after this Robbery, he absconded from Beaumaris, and early in August following he negotiated at Oxford a Bill of Exchange for £14 1&. which was taken out of this Mail, and endorsed it in the Name of "Wm. Mall."" (General Post-Office, July 6, 1790)
William made at least seven escape attempts assisted by his bigamous wife Amy Clarke (initially of Alfreton, Derbyshire).
The first involved Amy smuggling into the Gaol two saws and one dozen files which she strapped to her legs. When the first plan failed William persuaded a fellow prisoner, Charles Williamson, who was a member of a chain gang, to take an impression of the key held by a negligent and corrupt under turn-key. The chain gang member was to deliver the impression to a locksmith in Wolverhampton when he escaped. Charles Williamson did manage to escape but was recaptured in January 1791. Not giving up the plan, William asked Amy to bring clay to the Gaol and with the help of the under turn-key impressions of the key were made and later smuggled out of the Gaol. However this plan also seems to have failed. The next plan involved Amy bringing a bottle of Laudnum to drug the turn-key, Thompson. Forty-two drops were put in Thompson's wine to test his head. Three weeks later he died. William was suspected of poisoning him but there was no evidence to confirm this and it was concluded that Thompson had died from natural causes. In another escape plan Amy sent two parcels marked "tea" and "sugar" to the Goal. This plan also failed when the weight from the parcels caused Amy's servant-girl (who carried meat & luxuries to the Goal for William) to be suspicious. The parcels were opened and found to contain files. In yet another plan William's friend Charles Williamson managed to knock the turn-key to the ground but not before the latter had thrown the keys through the window, raising the alarm. Another plan involving gunpowder also failed when someone tipped off the goaler.
William was finally brought to trial on 18 April 1791. When the prosecution's case closed and the Judge, Chief Justice Bearcroft, asked how the defence was to be conducted, William took a piece of paper from his pocket and read a prepared speech beginning:-
- "I, an unhappy prisoner, most humbly beg your Lordship and this jury, to take my most desperate case into consideration; indeed for me, for I have been entirely deprived of making any defence for my safety; likewise very unjust advantages have been taken against me, contrary I think to law and justice"
He was hanged (21 April 1791) at Boughton and gibbeted on Helsby Hill. According to Joseph Hemingway's 'History of the City of Chester' (1831) "the gibbet pole was in a short time after cut down by some people in the neighbourhood, and was not again erected."
The last hangings at Boughton
Gallows Hill, as its name suggests, was the Tyburn of Chester and the exact location may well be the small park near the house "Edgeley". A wealth of gory detail can be found in Roy Wilding's book 'Death in Chester'. The following tale about the gallows is found in Joseph Hemingway's History of the City of Chester - written in 1831:
- "About the centre of this elegant group of buildings, thirty years ago, stood that memento mori to the passing traveller, vulgarly called the gallows, where many of our unfortunate fellow creatures have forfeited their lives to the violated laws of their country. A short time prior to this period, this terrific engine of death had its station exactly on the opposite side of the road, which, on account of its elevated situation, received the appellation of Gallows Hill, which, hy a precipitate descent, and without an inclosure, went down to the Dee. There is an incident connected with this place of execution worthy of recording. In May, 1801, as three malefactors, convicted of burglary at the spring assizes, were conveying to execution in a cart, one of them, named Clare, when opposite the gallows, and just when the vehicle was turning, gave a sudden spring, and threw himself upon the top of the precipice descending to the river, and jumped, rolled, and tumbled along till he was precipitated into it. The weight of his irons sunk him to the bottom, and before he could be brought up, life was entirely extinct. Although the unfortunate fellow thus evaded the letter of his sentence, in escaping being hanged by the neck till he was dead, yet the finisher of the law was unwilling to forego his official duty, and the dead body of the criminal was tied up after his breath had departed. The most afflictive part of the tragedy was, that the two poor men who were in a like condemnation, were kept in a state of awful suspense until the dead carcase of the drowned man was tied up beside them."
The Museum of Policing in Cheshire records that on May 9th 1801 "Thompson, Morgan and Clare" were indeed executed for burglary. However "Infamous Cheshire" records that while Thompson and Morgan were unpopular forgers who had "cheated and ruined the lives of a number of local people", John Clare had some sympathy because he had committed a relatively minor crime. At his trial, John Clare had shouted that "he would never hang" - technically he did hang, although he drowned first.
"Thompson, Morgan and Clare" was the last public execution at Gallows Hill. It has been suggested that it was the "bungled" 1801 hanging of John Clare that led to a shift in public sympathy away from public executions and that thereafter executions were conducted in private at the Nothgate Gaol. However, this is untrue, the two executions known to have taken place at Northgate were very public and public hangings continued at the City Gaol until 1866 with even larger crowds than were known at Boughton.
Executions at Northgate
After 1801, condemned men (and women) were briefly sent to Northgate Gaol for execution. Hemingway describes the older Northgate as follows:
- This ancient gate adjoining which was a mean and ruinous gaol was an inconvenient and unseemly pile of building It consisted of a dark narrow passage under a pointed arch with a postern on the east side and the entrance to the prison Immediately under the gate way at the depth of some thirty feet from the level of the street was a horrible dungeon to which the only access of air was through pipes which communicated with the street In this frightful hole prisoners under sentence of death were confined itself a living death.
Very few executions took place at Northgate. On October 3rd 1801 Aaron Gee and Thomas Gibson were hung out of a temporary window on the south side of the old Northgate. It was a somewhat makeshift gallows, they were "propelled from the window about 5 feet and dropped near 40 inches", then proceeded to annoy the jaillor by rattling against his window and breaking the glass. Thereafter, there are no further recorded hangings until executions moved to the City Gaol (where the Queen's School is) in 1809.
In the early nineteenth century, much of the news of England's murders and executions was brought to the masses through penny and half-penny "broadsides". As one of the most popular forms of street literature, broadsides were the tabloid newspapers of their day, selling near the gallows on execution days. A single sheet of paper printed on one side, the broadside usually included an account of the crime, a woodcut illustration (often a scene depicting the execution), a description of the convict’s final hours and his last dying confession. The latter was often given in the form of a cautionary verse, emphasising the sorrow of the convict and warning readers of the dangers of drink and bad company. The broadsides were printed in advance of executions and so were often innaccurate. Many, if not all, of the gallows speeches and confessions reported were completely fictional, while some printers even reused entire texts, changing only the names. Woodcuts could be reused as the occasion demanded, and stock illustrations of the gallows even had a removable section designed to accommodate the required number of hanging bodies!
The only relic of the gaol which has been retained at Northgate is the "Bridge of Sighs". The bridge cost £20 ($30) to build in 1793, and was designed by Joeseph Turner. It originally went from the Prison to a nearby chapel (in St John's Hospital) and had iron railings to prevent the prisoners from escaping. During WWII the metal railings were removed to be melted down (like many others) as a source of metal (but were never used). It is described by Ronald Leigh in his memories recorded at the The Museum of Policing in Cheshire as follows:
- Prisons unfortunately always seem to be necessary in any form of communal life and Chester seems to be no exception. No doubt the Romans had one but this is no longer apparent. However the site at the one at the Northgate is still on record. It forms part of the actual Northgate and the dungeons were in the sandstone rock of its foundations. The place of execution was also in the jail itself and prisoners before their execution were taken outside the walls to the church of Little St. John, which stood on or near the present site of the Blue Coat building. It was found that whilst taking this last walk, friends of such prisoners frequently staged attempts to free them. In order to foil such attempts by these footpads thieves and felons, the authorities in 1793 built the small bridge which can still be seen, less its protecting railway [sic] between the City walls in the west side of Northgate over the moat/canal to the Blue Coat school.
The name of the bridge is supposedly taken from the same-named bridge in Venice which passes over the Rio di Palazzo, and connects the New Prison (Prigioni Nuove) to the interrogation rooms in the Doge's Palace. The one in Venice dates from 1600. The Venetian bridge's English name was supposedly bestowed by Lord Byron (22 January 1788 – 19 April 1824) in the 19th century as a translation from the Italian "Ponte dei sospiri", from the suggestion that prisoners would sigh at their final view of beautiful Venice through the window before being taken down to their cells. Given that the Chester bridge was constructed in 1793 (when Byron was still a young child) one legend or the other is not completely correct. Also, Turner's bridge was not the first to pass between Northgate Gaol and St John's Hospital. In his 1777 report on the prison John Howard makes it clear that such a bridge was also used by those who were not about to be executed:
- "MR DUKE is Chaplain to the Blue Coat School and officiates in little St John's Chapel belonging to the School. A Navigation parts that from the Prison yard and a foot bridge made for the purpose gives these Prisoners an opportunity of attending Divine Service when it is performed, that is Prayers twice a week and Sermon once a month. Few Prisoners in City or Town Gaols have such a privilege."
As the present bridge dates from 1793, Howard is clearly referring to an earlier, possibly wooden, bridge.
Executions at City Gaol
The Chester City Gaol is often said to be one of the first to install a 'drop', or mechanical gallows. The gallows originally stood high on the front of the building where they were used for the public hangings of Chester criminals. The grisly scenes of death attracted large, ghoulish crowds. There is an old saying in Chester: "Five days racing, one day hanging" which refers to the fact that executions often followed a Race Meeting and these meetings only swelled the crowds.
The City Gaol was erected in 1807. It ceased to be a gaol in 1871 and prisoners moved to the County Gaol at the Castle. The first execution here was on 6th May 1809 when George Glover and William Proudlove were hung for shooting at (and missing) an excise officer. The drop was used for the first time and the ropes broke, leaving the two still alive. New ropes were procured and the sentence carried out about 1 hour later. Apparently, the two condemned men remained remarkably calm during their wait for their repeat performance, and did not pretend innocence proven by "divine intervention" (the present author would have!). Contrary to popular belief, there is no actual provision in English law that if the rope breaks or the trap jams you get set free. However there were a very few cases where a sentence was commuted after a failed hanging - but none in Chester.
The following list of executions at the City Gaol is not exhaustive, but restricted to those which have some element of note, such a particularly notorious murder, or a lesser crime for which the death penalty would be abolished prior to it being removed completely.
1810: John Done, Smith & Clark
John Done, was executed May 2nd for the murder of Betty Eckersly, a "woman of bad character" at Lymm. He denied the offence to his last moment. The body was to be delivered to Griffith Rowlands, Surgeon, for dissection. He was the first person executed at the New Gaol to suffer this fate. The Manchester Mercury, 8 May 1810 reported that he:
- "... was taken in a cart, from the Castle, and about ten minutes past two o'clock was launched into eternity from the drop at the back of the new gaol, in that city."
Rowlands was appointed surgeon to the Infirmary in 1785 and lived in Abbey Street next to the Kaleyard Gate.
Done was followed by the executions of Smith & Clark (October 1st) for burglary & felony in the shop of Mr. Fletcher, a watchmaker of Eastgate Street. The conduct of Smith on the drop "was exceedingly unbending and audacious", and the night before his execution he played at cards with some of his companions. Not being murderers they were buried in St Martin's churchyard rather than being dissected.
1812: John Lomas
Edith Morrey was born Edith Coomer and married George Morrey, a farmer’s son on Tuesday the 18th of April 1797 at St. Chad’s Church in Wybunbury in southern Cheshire. She was then about nineteen years old and the daughter of a well to do farmer. Initially the marriage was happy and they settled in the Cheshire town of Nantwich. George opened a grocery store there and the couple made a reasonable living over the next four years. In early 1801 they returned to the village of Hankelow, near Audlem to take over George’s father’s farm when he retired. They were blessed with seven children, three boys and four girls, although one of the girls died in infancy. George tended the farm whilst Edith made cheese for sale locally and looked after the family. They had a maid, Hannah Evans who had been with them nearly a year and a twenty year old farmhand called John Lomas who had just joined them. At this time Edith was once again pregnant but was to have a miscarriage in February 1812. We have no means of knowing Edith’s emotional state at the time, so soon after a miscarriage, but it was quite possibly rather fragile. For whatever reason Edith quickly fell for John and they began having an affair. Over the next two months or so Edith started to think in terms of marrying this young man, some fifteen years her junior, however there was one obvious impediment, George. No doubt Edith was not prepared to give up her children and comfortable life style by simply running away with John, nor was she willing to face the social disgrace that this course of action entailed at the time. So another way had to be found to keep John’s affections and rid themselves of George. Edith determined that John should kill George and afterwards they could be together. On Saturday the 11th of April 1812 George had been to Witton Wakes, a major fair in Northwich and did not return home until midnight. Edith and Hannah Evans were still up at this time and George had supper before he and Edith retired to bed. Hannah went a little later after she had cleared away the supper. Hannah was soon awakened though, by the sounds of a commotion from inside the house. She and John Lomas ran to the house of a neighbour to raise the alarm. The pair then returned to the farm with a couple of neighbours, Thomas Timmis and John Moores. The two men found Edith sitting by the fireplace and then opened the door into George’s bedroom where they made a grim discovery. George was laying face down on the floor with an axe handle projecting from underneath him. He had several axe wounds and in addition had had his throat cut, so there was blood everywhere.
Edith and John stood trial on Friday August the 21st before Chief Justice Robert Dallas and Francis Burton, a more junior judge. They were both charged with Petty Treason rather than murder, as the deceased was the husband of one defendant and the master of the other. The jury returned a verdict of guilty against both prisoners after just a few minutes discussion. Judge Dallas then addressed both of them, suggesting that although he believed that John had actually carried out the killing it was Edith whose guilt was the greater for planning and organising the destruction of her husband. Asked if had anything further to say before he was sentenced John told the court that he deserved his execution and hoped to be quickly forgotten. On Edith’s behalf John Cross told the court that she was pregnant and thus could not be sentenced to death at this time.
John’s hanging took place on Monday the 24th of August 1812. He spent sometime with the chaplain, the Reverend William Fish, before being led out up to the roof for his appointment with Cheshire’s hangman, Samuel Burrows. Fish seems to had a close connection with executions as the History of the Church and Parish of St. Mary-on-the-Hill notes:
- "In connection with the Rev. William Fish it may be mentioned that in 1809 the following sermon by him was published :— •• A Sermon preached in the Chapel of the Castle of Chester previous to The Execution of the condemned criminals George Glover and William Proudlove, who suffered on Saturday the 6th* of May. By the Rev. Wm. Fish, A B. Chester, printed by J. Fletcher. 1809." Octavo, pp. 32."
A large crowd had gathered to witness the event and the usual broadsides were sold. John made a short speech from the gallows warning others not to follow his example. His body was dissected after death by Owen Titley at the Infirmary next door to the gaol. The following day the Infirmary Board of Management was informed that the bones had been presented to the Infirmary, and it was ordered that they should be sent to London “for articulation”.
1812: Temple and Thompson
1812 also saw the execution at Chester of a pair of "Luddites" (Temple and Thompson) for rioting. There were several men called Thompson on trial all of whom were weavers. The Luddite movement was particularly active at this time at a report from Chester from April 1812 declared:
- "We are threatened with scenes of riots and disorder, occasioned by the distress experienced among the lower orders from want of employment and high price of provisions. Two attempts have lately been made in Stockport, one in Spencer and Company's in Hillgate . . . a weaving factory of vast extent where the work is done wholly by children. Part of a window was taken out and several torches put in . . . In Stockport threatening letters have been sent to people signed 'Ned Ludd.' On Saturday night a ball was fired at the proprietor of a factory where the looms were worked by power."
The British economy suffered greatly in 1810 to 1812, especially in terms of high unemployment and inflation. The causes included the high cost of the wars with Napoleon, Napoleon's Continental System of economic warfare, and escalating conflict with the United States. Other causes were associated with the rise of industrialisation and changes in agricultural methods. The crisis led to widespread protest and violence, but the middle classes and upper classes strongly supported the government, which used the army to suppress all working-class unrest, especially the Luddite movement. "Special" Luddite trials were held at Chester, Lancaster and York.
On Tuesday 26th May 1812, the second Special Assize held in the North West commenced in Chester. The purpose of the trials were to try those committed to Chester Castle for offences in Cheshire during the disturbances the previous month.
The Leeds Mercury of 23rd May suggested that prior to the start of the trials 'an intimation was received' (presumably in a threatening letter) that an attempt would be made to rescue the prisoners. A week later, the Mercury reported on how seriously the authorities were taking security: 600 of the Local Militia of the city of Chester, as well as 300 of the North Lincoln Militia and 90 of the Oxford Blues (cavalry) would occupy the Castle Yard during the trials. Every man had 10 rounds of ball cartridge. The Grand Jury included many local notables, including Wilbraham Egerton, Foreman, S. Alderley, Richard Congreve, W. W. Currey, C. Cholmondeley, C. Dod, Birkenhead Clegg, Booth Grey, Henry Hesketh, Bell Ince, Charles Leycester, Egerton Legh (the father of the writer of the same name), Thomas Marshall, Richard Richardson, Roger Swettenham, T. Tarleton, E. O. Wrench (owner of the Dee Mills), Robert Willmot, and, George Ormerod who was just starting to write his history.
The Chester Special Commission reveals more-or-less the historical capital rate for execution following trial at Chester. Of the sixteen sentenced to death, eleven were reprieved and given transportation for life. Of the five sentenced to hang, only two were hanged (on June 15, 1812) with the remaining three given temporary reprieves and ultimately full reprieves. This is a ratio of one out of eight, which is consistent with historical outcomes for capital convictions during this period. However at Lancaster and York the penalties were much more severe with seventeen out of eighteen hanged at York, and all eight, including one female and a youth of sixteen, hanged at Lancaster. It sems that there were attempts to interfere with the trials in the form of an unsuccessful attempt to influence the executions at Cheshire by H. Hobhouse, the Treasury solicitor, in attendance at the Cheshire trials, expressing the view that at least one execution was required for each of three serious offences:
- “robbery under colour of begging, robbery under colour of purchasing, and breaking of machinery.” (H. Hobhouse to the Home Office, May 30, 1812, HO 42/123 (69)).
Unlike the York Special Commission and Lancaster Special Assizes, there is no detailed record available produced by an attendee at the Chester Luddite trials. The local newspapers, often a useful source on the content of trial proceedings, only reported the trial outcomes. The Chester Courant only provided the initial charge to the jury and the sentencing.
1812: Edith Morrey
Four months after John Lomas's execution Edith Morrey gave birth in Chester City Gaol to a healthy boy on 21 December 1812. Local newspapers reported that she hoped for a pardon so her seven children would not be orphaned. Edith, the co-accused, had anticipated being sentenced for ‘petty treason’ and to be burned at the stake (the penalty for a spouse-killer at the time), but the judge ordered her to die on the gallows and be dissected too for being conniving.
Samuel Burrows the Cheshire hangman was not minded to be merciful to a murderess. As instructed, he executed Edith at the spring Assizes of 1813 and sent her baby for adoption. The Times newspaper described how ‘ten thousand people’ assembled for her execution and "post‐mortem punishments", timetabled in tandem:
- "On Friday morning at 12 o'clock this wretched woman was delivered by Mr Hudson, constable of Chester Castle into the hands of Messrs Thomas and Bennett, the City Sheriff for execution …; she got into the cart, and immediately laid down on one side, concealing her face with her handkerchief, which she had invariably done in public … She was very much convulsed for a few minutes when her pangs ceased in this world. After hanging the usual time, her body was delivered to the surgeons for dissection, and was open to public inspection during all Saturday."
In this case, Edith Morrey's body was hanged at Chester Gaol and then sent next door to Chester Infirmary. Owen Titley initially opened ‘her [Edith's] thorax and abdomen and removed her heart for preservation’ (he had done the same for Lomas). The penal surgeon was effectively checking that the prisoner was dead and had not survived the gallows. Then he sewed the body back up and sent it back to the Shire Hall courthouse at Chester Castle. On the way it was accompanied by a huge parade of local people. Edith's body was brought inside the main entrance and placed on a portable dissection table. The public space was carefully chosen in the community both for its legal symbolism and for the practical reason that it could accommodate the large audience assembled to see the post‐mortem cuts. A slightly different version of her anatomisation was reported in the Chester Chronicle:
- "The assistant placed the tools of Mr.Titley’s trade close at hand then, having snipped open the canvas shroud, he pulled it aside. This action was repeated with professional precision by his master. But not on canvas. An incision was made from the throat — just below a, discoloured seam of scar tissue around an old wound — along the line of the sternum. Next the strokes laid bare the thoracic cavity. After the breast bone itself and part of the rib cage had been sawn through and lifted out, a perfect view was obtained of the heart, lungs and cardio vascular system. Finally, using a broader-bladed scalpel and forceps, Titley extended the original incision downwards, opening up The abdominal cavity and exposing the viscera — et cetera"
In effect, this was not dissection but simply slicing the body open for inspection as part of a public spectacle.
In the main hall, the body was left open for public consumption over the next twenty‐four hours. Local people filed past the criminal corpse in two orderly queues. The throughput of audience members was calculated by local newspaper reporters to be "four hundred and sixteen people per hour" – on average seven spectators a minute – to ensure that "all ten thousand spectators" had a chance to view the criminal corpse. They were permitted to look but not touch, and were directed to keep moving along Edith's cadaver, down two sides of the dissection table. The next day, the Shire Hall doors were closed, and the criminal corpse was moved back to Chester Infirmary to complete a full‐scale dissection in detail conducted by Owen Titley.
Owen Titley died ten years later; suddenly and at a comparatively early age of 42. The interesting question is what became of Edith Morrey’s heart? Was it, like Lomas ‘s bones, given to the Infirmary for teaching purposes? Or did the surgeon keep it amongst his personal effects? Probably the latter. An 1816 history of Chester by Hanshall claimed that the organs in question were at that time "still in the possession of Mr. Titley surgeon of this city", This being so, it no doubt passed, on Owen Titley’a death, to his brother because Titley’s hastily made will, hand-written and witnessed by two fellow surgeons, left everything to Edward Titley — a Bridge Street druggist and notable collector of curiosities.
1813: William Wilkinson, John Burgess, William Yarwood
All from Northwich in Cheshire, they were hanged together for the rape of Mary Porter at Runcorn in Cheshire. The crime was committed on the 15th of January 1813. One George Randles was on the shore line when he heard a woman scream “Murder” and “O Lord help me.” He went before a justice and made a deposition of what he had seen and heard. The trio, who all worked "flat-boats" were arrested and duly came to trial at the Shire Hall in the outer bailey of Chester Castle. They were loaded into a cart and arrived at the City Gaol around 12.20 pm. The New Drop gallows was erected on the flat roof of the gatehouse. At 1.10 pm. they ascended the scaffold, Wilkinson first. As Wilkinson, a stout man about six feet high, mounted the scaffold, he exclaimed to his companions, “Keep your spirits; never mind, my lads we are all murdered men; I’m just as happy as if I was going to a play!” and when the halter was placed round his neck, he added, “My new handkerchief fits me nice and tight”.
It was Samuel Burrows, Chester’s hangman who applied the noose to him as he addressed the crowd. Burgess was next but he was reportedly quiet and reserved. Finally Yarwood joined them and exhorted the crowd not to mix with bad women. It seems, as is so often still the case, that they blamed the victim, Mary Porter, for their crime. The Rev. Mr. Willan prayed with the men for some time until Yarwood gave the signal by dropping a handkerchief and Samuel Burrows released the trap, "launching them into eternity", as was the parlance of the time. As they were not murderers their bodies were returned to their families after hanging for an hour.
1814: William Wilson
William Wilson was executed on May 28th for arson. He was 70 years old but this did not prevent him from "causing a stir" before and at the execution. Having spent the morning before at the "Constable's House" regailing all with accounts of his exploits as a sailor. Accounts state that in his way along the streets to the City Gaol he chewed bread in his mouth, and threw it at the beadle, observing he was like Peeping Tom at Coventry. On the drop he said, “What a many people are here to see an old man hung; here’s as much fuss as it there were a hundred to be hanged."
1817: Joseph Allen
Allen lived at Weaverham, occupying a farm with his wife. He was a market trader in Manchester, and suspicions were raised about the "banknotes" with which he paid for goods and services. The police investigated and a number of forged Bank of England notes were found at the farm, some with ink that was still damp. At the time "uttering" forged banknotes was a hanging offence.
In his defence Allen claimed to have obtained the notes from a certain "Jelley" and brought forth several witnesses to his honest character. He was tried at Chester and found guilty. Sir William Garrow then passed sentence, telling Allen that "it was now up to God to show mercy as there was no chance of any on earth". Allen exclaimed "Eh! dear, dear", before being taken to the City Gaol and the drop. After the execution his body was placed in a handsome coffin and conveyed by hearse to Weaverham where a collection was made for his now destitute family including seven children. Joseph Jelley was also put on trial, together with Allen's brother Samuel. Jelley was aquitted and the brother transported. Whoever made the "plates" from which the notes were printed was never identified.
1823: Samuel Fallows
Fallows was executed on the 14 April 1823 for the murder of his girlfriend Betty Shawcross. She was found with her throat cut by a razor. It seems it was not that she had spurned him, but that he owed her money for the upkeep of the child they had between them. He had also made another woman, Mary Coup, pregnant, and had promised to marry her. He had, reported the Manchester Mercury, a "closeness of disposition in money matters", but reportedly offered the Constable of the Castle £1000 to aid his escape.
At the time the hangman was entitled to take the clothes of the person he executed. Fallows insisted that he was hanged in an old blue coat, as he did not want the hangman (Burrows) to profit from his suit. His body was subjected to "Galvanic experiments" after it had been left for longer than the customary hour, in the Castle.
1824: Joseph Dale
Dale was executed for his part in the death of William Wood on the road between Whaley Bridge and Disley in 1823. The spot is marked by a stone on which is inscribed: "WILLIAM WOOD EYAM DERBYSHIRE HERE MURDERED JULY 16TH A.D. 1823 PREPARE TO MEET THY GOD". No evidence appearing to identify the murderers was offered at the inquest and the Jury returned a verdict of wilful murder, against some person or persons unknown. However it then became clear that three young men had arrived in Macclesfield with enough money to buy three completely new sets of clothes and a considerable quantity of food and drink. They left their old clothes which were later found to be bloodstained. Eventually the police managed to arrest one of them, who committed suicide in custody. Dale was later caught at Liverpool, and claimed that while he was with the other two before and after, they were the murderers and he was in a public house when the murder was carried out.
19-year-old Joseph Dale, a man described in court as “a very peaceable, quiet lad, always good tempered, and kind to his parents”, was executed according to the custom that he was handed over from the county jail to the city jail for execution. Records state:
- "Early as was his removal from the County gaol to the city, many persons were there to witness his transit, and with as many as came within his reach he cordially shook hands, bidding them an affectionate farewell. He did not appear so badly in health as was generally expected. Dale always claimed innocence having met two others while travelling, Taylor and Platt, who he claimed were the actual murderers of a fourth man they met on the road."
After hanging one hour, the body was cut down, and subsequently delivered to the surgeons for dissection. The case was extensively reported in the newspapers.
1829: Joseph Woodhouse and John Henshall
Not everyone sentenced to death at Chester was hanged. The Cambrian of 3rd October 1829 reported on the recent Chester assizes as follows:
- Joseph Woodhouse and John Henshall were executed on Saturday at Chester, the former for a rape on his own daughter, a child only eleven years old, and the latter for shooting one of Lord Stamford's gamekeepers. H. Wyatt, convicted of stabbing James Burgess, a cotton-spinner, at Stockport, and sentenced to death, has been respited; and, owing to the merciful interference in his behalf by the principal master manufacturers in Stockport and its vicinity, strong hopes are entertained that his sentence will be commuted to transportation for life. T. and W. Wyatt, and J. Pollitt, against whom sentence of death was recorded, as aiders and abettors, have had their sentences commuted to two years' imprisonment each in Knutsford House of Correction.
The report is not accurate in that Henshall, described in other reports as "a fine promising young fellow" did not actually fire a shot, but provided powder and shot to others, a gang known as the Dunham Poachers. It might have been a defence that he was providing it for poaching. His execution seems to have been somewhat bungled with him suffering slow strangulation. As these were not murderers the bodies would have been returned to the families for burial. In the cases where the death sentence was "respited" this was not a pardon but a postponement. Between 1770 and 1830, an estimated 35,000 death sentences were handed down in England and Wales, of which 7,000 executions were carried out. The Judgement of Death Act 1823 gave judges the official power to commute the death penalty except for treason and murder. It appeared that, in the year 1831, there were sentenced to death for sheep-stealing in England and Wales, 162 persons — executed one; sentenced to death for horse-stealing, 125 — executed none; sentenced to death for larceny in a dwelling-house, 100 — executed none. In 1832, the death penalty was abolished for theft, counterfeiting, and forgery except for the forgery of wills and certain powers of attorney: the exception was abolished in 1837.
1834: Samuel Thorley
Samuel Thorley was a a gardener, and nursery and seedsman in Northwich and the great-nephew of the "Congleton Cannibal" of the same name. He was born in Witton cum Twambrooks on the April 8, 1804. In 1833 he spent the early part of the year preparing for his marriage to Mary Pemberton, a 21 year-old servant girl from Leftwich and his sweetheart. Mary lived on a farm with her recently widowed mother having been born in Davenham. It would appear that Thorley turned to drink, spending his days in the Angel Hotel in High Street. After a while, Mary’s family noticed that nothing had been done. The house he promised to buy was not bought, and the wedding arrangements had not commenced.
There are variouis accounts of what happened but they evidently fell out over something (most likely her discovery of his several illegitimate children) and the wedding was called off. Thorley turned to drink again. Sometime later, on the evening of a Market Day he met her in the street, probably the worse for drink. He insisted on coming home with her and took hold of her basket. Halfway to her house, which was about half a mile away, they were met by her married sister, who took her arm, and the two sisters left him. Later on that evening, Thorley went to her house and knocked on the door. Mary let him in thinking it was one of her brothers. The brother had not returned, and she was waiting up for him. When her brother did return, Mary was sitting talking with Thorley, and her brother hearing the talk in the front room not wishing to disturb them went straight to bed. Two or three times, Mrs Pemberton shouted down to Mary, asking if she was coming up to bed. Mary shouted back that she would be up shortly. A few minutes later, Mrs Pemberton heard the front door slam, again she called to Mary and received no reply so went downstairs. She found Mary lying in the lobby covered in blood, as was the room. Thorley had slit her throat almost severing her head.
Thorley went home and told his servant what he had done; he was covered in blood and changed his clothes, telling the boy to go and tell his father. He then walked to Chester Castle and gave himself up, was tried, and hanged on the 7th April 1834. The hangman was Samuel Burrows and some state this was his final duty before retiring. However Samuel's last job was actually just over a week later, and also his biggest one, the quadruple hanging at Chester on the 19th of April 1834 when he hanged Thomas Riley for cutting and maiming, John Carr for stabbing, William Naylor for shooting with intent to murder, and James Mason for procuring an abortion.
1834: Nailor, Riley, Carr and Mason
The quadruple hanging of Thomas Riley, John Carr, William Naylor (or Nailor) and James Mason was Samuel Burrow's last "job" at Chester and one which he, and a priest, managed to botch to some extent. It was reported upon extensively in the Chester Chronicle of 25th April 1834.
Naylor was convicted on circumstantial evidence of shooting at (but not killing) a cotton-spinner named Wilkinson at Stayley. The evidence concerned boot-prints found behind a wall from which the shooter was thought to have fired. The newspaper implied that Naylor had become "a lunatic" after contracting a brain-fever in the East Indies. Riley appears to have been part of a mob which attacked William Fidler at Stockport and to have attempted to decapitate him with a reaping-hook. Despite serious wounds Fidler survived. Carr stabbed Thomas Horton (who survived) over twenty times in a Haslington pub. Mason was the only "successful" murderer of the four. He had raped Hannah Woodward and finding later that she was pregnant had beaten her so badly that she apparently died of her injuries shortly after. The murder charge was thrown out on a technicality but he was found guilty of procuring an abortion.
As usual there were vast crowds. The first botch-up was when Riley was brought out onto the scaffold by a Catholic priest and given a last opportunity for prayer. The priest then waited (kneeling) for the others to be brought out, while the sheriffs waited for the priest to finish. Three-quarters of an hour of this misunderstanding then passed with the priest praying, Riley standing on the trap, the Sheriffs waiting and the other three "in great anxiety". Eventually it was realised that there had been a breakdown of communications and all four were placed on the scaffold. Burrows then attempted to continue with the execution, but the trap stuck and Burrows desparately tried to shake and shove the mechanism into action. Carr and Mason apparently died "quickly" but Naylor and Riley struggled and Riley even managed to get his feet on part of the framework, which simply made his death worse.
Naylor's body was interred in the graveyard of the City Gaol, whereas the others were buried at St Mary on the Hill. After 1834, the bodies of all criminals executed were buried within the precincts of the prison in which they were last confined, in unmarked graves whose locations were recorded. Prior to 1834 those executed for crimes other than murder could be claimed by relatives and friends for burial in consecrated land.
1841: Bartholomew Murray
Bartholomew Murray was found guilty of killing a retired farmer and his wife with an axe following a lengthy trial at Chester's court. Joseph Cooke and his wife Mary Cooke, described as an "aged couple", lived in Over Peover, near Knutsford. During one harvest Mr Cooke employed labourers to work the farm - one of which was Murray, who was reportedly only 18 at the time of the murder. The labourers worked in a meadow near the couple's home, and one witness told the court that while working, Murray had asked him: "Are these old people rich?," to which the worker replied yes. Following his work at the Cookes', Murray travelled in search of further work. Around a fortnight later he made his way back to Knutsford. One night later Joseph and Mary Cooke were murdered with an axe under mysterious circumstances.
A 15-year-old girl had been sleeping upstairs when the Cookes were murdered, and woke after hearing their screams. She then heard the murderer come into her room and watch her in bed, to make sure she had not woken. After staring at her he then left her room, satisfied that she had not been disturbed. Unsurprisingly, the girl couldn't go back to sleep due to the moans of the couple downstairs. Going downstairs, she saw before her the couple lying on the floor in their own blood - and an axe left on the table. Murray was connected to the murder when bits of burned paper were discovered later that day, implicating his name in the incident. Murray had fled to Ireland but was recaptured there. A sudden improvement in Murray's finances following the murder sealed his fate in the eyes of the jury, who provided a swift guilty verdict. The 18-year-old was executed at Chester on April 24, 1841, to a crowd made up mostly of "respectably-attired females".
1843: James Ratcliffe
James Ratcliffe, who was around 58, was a tobacconist by trade and became an alcoholic. In an attempt to flee from her drunkard husband, his wife then moved away from Ratcliffe, with help from their son. Elizabeth, Ratcliffe's wife, took up residence in Stockport but did not tell her husband where she lived. Ratclliffe soon discovered the address, and waited outside the home of a neighbour until he saw his wife enter her property. He then feigned illness so that she would take him some water. When she did bring the water to him, he sprung up and stabbed her with a knife he had hidden in his sleeve. The woman's injuries were so severe that she died from them the next day. Ratcliffe was executed for the murder of his wife on September 2, 1843 in front of a crowd of 2000 people.
1844: Mary Gallop
Mary was a Sunday School teacher from Monk’s Coppenhall near Crewe, who’s father disapproved of the man she loved. Following an angry argument, she bought some arsenic and poisoned her father. Between October 21 and November 2, 1844 Mary Gallop bought numerous amounts of arsenic from someone named only as Thomas, with the alleged purpose of being used to destroy rats. Arsenic was a favourite of Victorian poisoners. Because the symptoms are similar to those of cholera, which was common at the time, arsenic poisoning often went undetected. By the 19th century, it had acquired the nickname "inheritance powder," perhaps because impatient heirs were known or suspected to use it to ensure or accelerate their inheritances. Arsenic was widely available and is reputed to have a slightly sweet taste meaning its presence could be disguised with sugar. The chemist James Marsh developed an improved test for it in 1836. So sensitive was the test that it could detect as little as one-fiftieth of a milligram of arsenic.
Reportedly, her father (Richard Gallop) was something of a bully, according to one theory resulting in his wife and the mother of Mary taking her own life. Upon the death pf her mother Maty herself apparently became the focus of her father's cruelty. A part of her defence at trial was that Mary's mother had been deemed 'insane' while she was pregnant with her. As insanity was thought to be hereditary it was believed that this could be a possible cause for the woman's actions.
The jury deliberated for five minutes, finding her guiltly but recommending clemency. A petition, an abridged version of which was published in The Welshman, was put forward and signed by the Bishop of Chester along with other members of the clergy. Among the reasons put forward for Gallop's sentence to be reconsidered were that it "does not appear to have been long premeditated" but "accidentally suggested to her mind" by someone in her company. The judge dismissed any calls for mercy and pronounced a death sentence.
She confessed before her execution to having tried once to poison her father by putting arsenic in a cake, which was unsuccessful, and then putting it with arrowroot, which her father himself mixed with milk and drank. She had to be carried to the gallows in a chair, as she was so distressed she was unable to walk, and as a result, the drop was too short, and she "died hard".
1856: William Jackson
As reported in the Wrexham Advertiser, William Jackson was executed at the City Gaol after:
- "numbers of idlers were lounging in front of the prison, watching the erection of the terrible apparatus of death".
Jackson, who was staying at the Coach and Horses in Handbridge had been sent his sister's children (Mary Jane aged 7 and John aged 6) to look after, decided they would be better off dead and murdered them at "Holden's Field" off Eaton Road, hiding the bodies in a pit. His gravestone suggested the pit was located in Richard Roger’s orchard off the Old Wrexham Road. Afterwards he claimed to have picked some apples for his landlady. He confessed that:
- "And many times did I eat my dinner with the same knife afterwards. I could not rest day nor night. I have been to the pit many times at 10 and 11 O'clock at night, and three or four times a-day"
One posssible candidate for the location of the orchard where the murders were committed was behind Greenbank Hall, on land which was owned shortly before by a John Roger, but perhaps fortunately the location is not known with certainty.
1861: Martin Doyle
The Aberdare Times reported that:
- "..the fact that the extreme penalty of the law has not been carried into effect for many years in the case of a criminal convicted of the offence for which Doyle has suffered, the crowd was more than usually great."
They add that:
- "The day was somewhat cloudy, but, notwithstanding the threatening aspect of the weather, the crowd was tremendous."
The Doyle case is interesting because he was executed for "intent to murder". The "Pembrokeshire Herald and General Advertiser" recounts in detail the story of Doyle's trial, at which the victim (Jane Brogine) appeared in order to testify against him despite her unwell state. It was reported that she did not seem fit to give evidence, with her face "seamed and scarred in the most dreadful manner", the sight of which invoked a "perfect thrill of horror" in the court. Brogine had apparently left her husband to live with Doyle and he had attacked her with a rock. Martin Doyle was the last person to be executed at Chester, or anywhere else in England, for attempted murder.
1863: Alice Holt
On Monday the 28th of December 1863 Alice Holt became the last woman to be executed at Chester. 27 year old widow, Alice Hewitt, was co-habiting with her boyfriend, George Holt in a two up, two down slum house in Great Egerton Street in Stockport in Cheshire. She had adopted his surname and called herself Mrs. Holt. Also in the house was Alice’s mother, 51 year old Mary Bailey and four lodgers, George Bailey (no relation to Mary), his wife, Ann and their two children. In the winter of 1862/3 Mary became ill with bronchitis and complained that “her daughter would not work and did not use her well.” In early 1863 Alice became pregnant by George Holt.
Alice, then 27, hit on the idea of insuring her mothers life for £25. She realised that Mrs. Bailey would never pass a medical test, so she persuaded a friend to impersonate her for the medical. The scam worked, the insurance policy was accepted by the Wesleyan Assurance Society, and Alice and the woman lodger then went off to buy some arsenic. On March 27th, 1863, Mrs. Bailey died, the doctor certified natural causes, and the insurers paid up the £25. However the lodger was heard to remark that she was not sure quite what the arsenic was for. Having been buried, it was found that Mary Bailey had all the symptoms of arsenic poisoning - and after her body was disinterred it was found to have been 'saturated' with arsenic. Alice was arrested and charged, although her case was not tried at the summer assizes, as Alice was pregnant. Alice tried to throw the blame onto George Holt, but she was tried and convicted. She was taken from the County to the City Gaol in the middle of the night before her execution, and on arrival apparently had coffee and toast.
As reported in the Usk Observer Alice was hanged by William Calcraft in front of Chester City Gaol on Monday, December 28th, 1863, wearing a thin, print dress and chewing peppermints, which she had specially requested. A crowd, estimated at between 1,000 and 2,000, a majority of whom were women had come to watch her hang. As she approached the gallows she partially collapsed and she had to be dragged on to the trap-door. Executioner Calcraft made the usual preparations but when he withdrew the bolt the trap doors stuck. Alice was by now wailing piteously. It took two further attempts before the trap doors finally opened. She dropped no more than two feet through them convulsing for two to three minutes before becoming still. Calcraft blamed the weather and the equipment.
1866: Samuel Griffiths
Isaac Newport, a 65-year-old labourer living at Long Green, near Barrow outside of Chester, was found dead after having been drinking at the Railway Inn pub (now the Dunham Arms) in Helsby. Isaac had been discovered on the evening of February 26, 1866, lying dead in a ditch. The man's face was so disfigured that at first he wasn't recognisable, and it was only when his body was examined that it became apparent it was Isaac Newport.
A Chester court found Samuel Griffiths guilty for the crime, after Isaac's property was found on his person. Griffiths, had been drinking with Isaac a short time before his death. They had been pig-dealing and there was little doubt that they were both quite intoxicated as they left at 2pm. The crime was reported as follows:
- "Newport, with whom Griffiths had been drinking, took the way of church lane in order to make a short cut to his house whilst Griffiths, supposing him to have gone by a more circuitous route, went along the Frodsham-Chester road making frequent enquiries about him, and after repeated dodging, came up with him in one of woodwards fields on the west side of Manley lane. He then, by his own admission attacked Newport and robbed him of all his money which of course included what he had been paid for the pig, and with a drunken mans logic began to plan a more terrible deed of violence in order to conceal the evidence of the first crime. He followed Isaac Newport over the stile into Christians field and struck him in spite of the old man’s entreaties. He then completed his diabolical work by holding him down in the adjoining stream. This he did in broad daylight in the open field at a place within half a mile of the village and almost in view of the farmhouse on the highway. The murderer was seen slinking away from the scene of the crime and when apprehended a few hours afterwards he still had the stunning evidence of his guilt upon him in the purse made out of an old curtain by the murdered man’s wife. On the morning of his execution he was quite prepared to die. He was glad he would not then be able to commit any more foul deeds and it was better thus."
Griffiths was executed for the murder on April 23, 1866. The execution was carried out before a crowd of 2000 during the opening day of race week at the City Gaol next to the Infirmary. It was to be the last public execution at Chester.
Other Locations, Including the Castle
Chester Castle
"Criminals" also died at Chester Castle which is first mentioned as a jail in 1241. Later maps show the "Jayl" was located in the outer bailey.
It is generally supposed that he punishment of loading a prisoner who refused to plead with weights or "pressing" (often called "Peine forte et dure") and crushing them (to death if necessary) was introduced in the time of Edward III. However, T. A. Coward, in his "Picturesque Cheshire", suggests that the practice actually originated in the time of Edward II at Chester:
- "Adam of the Woodhouses, having burnt the said houses and carried away his goods, was one of the stubborn men they gave him three morsels of bread one day, and three sups from the nearest puddle the next; but Adam lingered long on this sumptuous diet, so Edward II, then king, in order to accelerate the man’s decision, originated the idea of putting heavy weights upon the chest. Thus at Chester was instituted that barbarous punishment, if punishment it can be called, of pressing to death."
In 1601 a woman named Candy was hanged at Chester for conspiring to murder her husband, her accomplice was pressed to death for refusing to plead. The following entry appears in the parish records of St Mary on the Hill:
- 1631 - 'Thomas Laceby, a prisoner, pressed to death, buried in the churchyard on the north side of the steeple on the 23rd day of April. John Johnson, Joan Broome and Katherine Crosse, three persons that were executed, buried at the west end of the steeple in the churchyard the 25th day of April'.
In 1435 "pressing" seems to have been used simply as a means of execution. Peine forte et dure was abolished in the Kingdom of Great Britain in 1772, with the last known actual use of the practice having been in 1741. From 1772 refusing to plead was deemed to be equivalent to pleading guilty, but this was changed in 1827 to being deemed a plea of not guilty – which is now the case in all common law jurisdictions.
As of 1810, 222 capital penalties could result in a verdict of execution, but by the time of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861, only four offences carried the death penalty - murder, high treason, arson in a royal dockyard, and piracy. However, in practice, from 1836, only crimes of murder or attempted murder resulted in execution. Before then, murder was still the offence most likely to result in the death penalty - but that was closely followed by burglary. In England and Wales between 1800 and 1836, 497 people were put to death for murder, 467 for burglary, 314 for highway robbery, 217 for forgery and 162 for uttering (using forged money). There were also more people executed for horse theft (159) and sheep theft (138) than there were for the far more horrific crime of rape (124). Some 48 people were killed by the state for "sodomy", 30 for offences linked to rioting, 21 for high treason, and 10 for bestiality. In 1861 the minimum sentence for having sex with a girl under ten years old was two years, but for a sheep, pig or ass or "the abominable Crime of Buggery" (whether with "Mankind" or any animal) it was not less than ten, but thereafter no-longer carried the death penalty.
The gallows at the castle was built at the point inside the gaol opposite the Shipgate, which would place it below St Mary on the Hill.
William Bates was executed at Chester Castle in 1848. The Monmouthshire Merlin recorded the case. Bates was a highwayman. One curious fact about the case Bates was arrested together with an accomplice named Walmsley - but Walmsley was released after intervention from the governor of Chester Castle - although it's not exactly clear why. Bates insisted that Walmsley was not innocent and that the pair were responsible for another highway attack (on a priest) for which two other men had been sentenced to transportation.
1857: John Blagg
John Blagg was executed at Chester Castle in 1857. In 1857, the Tilstone Lodge gamekeeper John Bebbington, had risen from his bed early one morning to make his rounds of the woods and pheasant preserves: he was found lying dead in a ditch, with his loaded gun beside him. In an adjacent field the police discovered two sets of footprints – one belonging to the gamekeeper and the other set they traced to John Blagg, 47, a shoemaker and poacher. At Blagg’s home they found a gun and cartridges supposedly matching the one that shot Bebbington. They also found the boots that had apparently made the footprints, although this was one of the first cases of such evidence being used and no-doubt much was made of the "shoemakers boots". Blagg had previously threatened the gamekeeper (while drunk) and despite his protestations he was arrested and charged with murder. He was probably held in the village "lock-up" (which still exists) in School Lane, Bunbury.
His counsel argued that all the evidence was circumstantial:
- "The poor man is a victim of hatred because he was a poacher; and as the prosecution could not get hold the real murderer, they pounced on the prisoner because he happened, unfortunately, to be disliked by a Cheshire country gentleman."
After a trial lasting 10 hours Blagg was found guilty and sentenced to be hanged.
The case was reported as follows in the North Wales Chronicle:
- "On Friday morning John Blagg, convicted at the late assizes at Chester for the murder of John Bebbington, game keeper to Alr. Corbett, of Tilstone, was executed at Chester Castle. Exertions were made to procure a reprieve on the ground that the evidence was only circumstantial but the Home Secretary, ia reply to the communications made to him, stated that he did not see any feature in the case to justify him in interfering with the course of the law. When the unhappy man was informed that all efforts to save his life had failed he became very much depressed, and the full extent of his awful position and the fate which awaited him seemed to come with great force upon him. The untiring efforts of the rev. chaplain to bring the unhappy man to a proper sense of Imposition were in a great measure crowned with success. During the past few days the convict paid marked attention to the exhortations of the rev. gentleman, joined in prayer with apparent earnestness, and passed much of his time, when left alone with his attendant, in reading passages of Scriputre selected for his perusal. Although he had at times disputed the truth of portions of the evidence adduced against him, he never denied his crime or attempted to account for himself at the time of its commission. His sorrowing wife saw him several times after his conviction. In his interview with her on Tuesday Blagg displayed much more feeling than he had done on former occasions. A few minutes before eight o'clock the convict was visited in the condemned cell by Mr. Dunstan, the governor, the rev. chaplain, and others, who remained with him a short time, when he went through the process of being pinioned by the executioner. The bell then commenced to toll, and the mournful procession having been formed, proceeded to the scaffold. There, in a few moments, the solemn preparations were completed, the rope was adjusted, and, the bolt being withdrawn, the drop fell, and, almost momentarily, the convict was dead. A large crowd of persons, composed of all classes assembled to witness the painful spectacle."
What the newspaper fails to mention is that executioner Calcroft had to kick a bolt repeatedly to open the drop while Blagg stood upon it "patiently". This seems to indicate that there was already a hanging-scaffold at the Castle prior to the County taking over its own executions. Shortly before he died, Blagg had allegedly said to the turnkey that he knew who had committed the murder, but that he would never tell on him.
There the matter lay until over 30 years later when a Liverpool merchant, James Sawers, from Neston, paid a visit to New Orleans, and there received news of a startling confession made to the Rector of St Paul’s, New Orleans. James Sawers, (pronounced Seers) was described as a “worthy and honourable gentleman”, a wealthy local merchant and Proprietor of James Sawers & Co., a trading company which had premises in Liverpool, London, and South America, he was a prominent member of the local community and seemingly had no reason to lie. His news concerned the murder of John Bebbington. The story, from Henry Edwin Jones, was that Blagg had been getting ready to attend Chester market on the day before the murder and had loaned him a pair of boots. It was he, Jones, who confessed that he had murdered the gamekeeper. Tollemache, the local landowner appears to be one of the few who believed Blagg innocent: he allowed Blagg's widow to stay in her cottage until her death some forty years later. Coroner Churton (who had been involved in the murder of Charles Moston) revealed that the shot lodged in Bebbington's body (No. 4) was of a different type to that in Blagg's gun and when journalists (in 1890) checked the story of the boots the widow confirmed it. On the night before the murder she said that Jones, who was known to her husband, had called at the cottage. He had borrowed the boots, but she could not say how or when they were returned, between the murder and the police searching the cottage. She also said the police had spoken with Jones but had let him go and that they "had it in" for her husband.
Public executions in England were outlawed as the Capital Punishment Amendment Act 1868 came into force. The act required all executions to take place within the walls of the prison where they were held, with their bodies buried within the grounds of the prison. Its enforcement came as a public call from reformers to put an end to execution as a spectacle, which they believed the national press was turning it into. There are few records of the actual facilities for hanging at the Castle in Chester, but there are cases reported in the press:
1877: James Bannister
James Bannister, age unknown, was executed at the County Gaol of Chester Castle after gruesomely murdering his wife at their home on Russel Street, in Hyde. On December 15 1876, Bannister was heard by fellow lodgers speaking to his wife in friendly conversation during the evening while in bed. However, it seems a change of mood soon followed as Bannister was heard by his landlord - a Mr Grayson - at two o'clock in the morning shouting "Elijah!". On rushing to their room Mr Grayson found a grisly sight - Mrs. Bannister lying on the bed with her head crushed by a hatchet and her husband with his throat cut and a razor nearby, at least according to The Flintshire Observer. According to a variety of different newspaper sources it seems that Mrs Bannister died from her injuries a few days later, and Bannister was admitted to Manchester Infirmary in a 'dangerous condition'.
Following his recovery Bannister was tried and sentenced to death in Chester by Mr Justice Lush, in what would be the city's first private execution. During his time at Chester Castle Bannister appeared to show remorse for his actions and wrote a poem titled 'The Curse of Drink'. He was however hanged by William Marwood on the 2nd April 1877 in Chester. A rather gory detail is reported in the press:
- "The procession left the condemned cell a few minutes before eight o'clock. The condemned man walked with remark- able firmness of nerve, and placed himself under the drop without faltering or uttering a word, and he died without a struggle. After the drop, which was a very long one, the cord was seen to have penetrated into the old wound caused by attempted suicide. "
The case was also reported in the The North Wales Chronicle and Advertiser for the Principality (7th April 1877) which adds the snippet:
- "Just before the execution the unfortunate man said to the chaplain, Write to the Hyde Temperance Association, and ask them to carry on their good work."
1877: Henry Leigh
Henry Leigh, a labourer from Macclesfield, was found guilty of the planned murder of a young girl after he had overheard the girl's mother telling her to go to the mill where she worked and retrieve her wages. As the girl was returning from the mill, Leigh lured her away from the footpath towards the side of a canal. A few hours later Alice Ann Halton's body was found floating in the water - and her money was gone. The money was found in Leigh's possession and a jury found the man guilty of a "deliberate and brutal murder". Leigh was sentenced by Justice Bramwell and was executed at Chester on August 13, 1877. The Aberdare Times reported as follows:
- "On Monday morning, at eight o'clock, Harry Leigh, weaver, of Macclesfield, was hanged within the precincts of Chester Castle, for the murder of Alice Ann Hatton, eight years of age at Sutton, near Macclesfield, on the 31st of March. It will be remembered that the child's corpse was found floating in the canal at Sutton. She had been sent by her mother to the mill for her wages, and it was clearly proved that on her way home she was met by the prisoner, who led her to the canal side and robbed her, then threw her into the water and, as he states in his confession, left her to drown. Since his condemnation he has been very penitent, and thoroughly resigned to his fate. The procession from the cell started a few minutes after eight o'clock, the prisoner walking very firmly, and placing himself nnder the drop without a tremor. Marwood adjusted the rope, stepped behind the culprit, pulled a lever, and the wretched man, who was given a drop of seven feet, died almost instantaneously."
The North Wales Chronicle adds some further detail: that he was described as "a dwarf" and "degraded by drink and vicious conduct". Apparently, he had previously tried to steal the girls wages by forging a note and sending a messenger with it to the mill, an attempt which failed. The newspaper also adds that while awaiting execution he attemped to strangle himself with a handkerchief. Executioner Marwood apparently lodged at the "Red Lion" in Bridge Street and on the night before the execution was persuaded - by buying him drinks - to entertain those present by recounting tales of previous executions.
1881: William Stanway
A native of Newcastle-under-Lyme, who earned a living as a broom maker and hawker, convicted at Chester Assizes of the murder of Ann Mellor at Macclesfield, where they lived with their nine year old adopted daughter. Both were addicted to drink and frequently quarrelled, which usually ended with him giving her a beating. His defence that the crime was not premeditated was rejected and he was hanged by William Marwood on the 21st February 1881 in Chester.
The Flintshire Observer informs us that:
- "At eight o'clock on Monday morning, William Stamway, aged 31, was executed at Chester Castle for murdering Ann Mellor, at Macclesfield, by stabbing her in the abdomen with a red-hot poker. Reporters were not admitted to the execution. The condemned man had paid the utmost attention to his religious duties since his condemnation. When the time came he walked with a firm step to the gallows. The drop was eight feet six inches. Death was instantaneous. Some hundreds watched the hoisting of the black flag. The executioner was Marwood. Several petitions had been presented to the Home Secretary for a commutation of the sentence, on the ground that the prisoner did not premeditate murder, and that he was drunk when he committed the crime."
In fact, other reports show that there was a degree of premeditation: Merthyr Telegraph reported that:
- "The prisoner had been drinking, and returned at night very drunk. He appears to have brutally beaten deceased, with whom he lived, and then to have gone out to procure more liquor. On his return, finding the woman in bed, he told her to come down, and tlueatened if she did not he would bring a red-hot poker to her. She then came down- stairs into the kitchen, when he took the red-hot poker out of the fire and plunged it into her bowels, inflicting such terrible injuries that she died in great agony two days afterwards."
A similar report was published in the "Cardigan Observer":
- "Sarah Ann Blunt, a child aged nine years, whom prisoner and deceased had adopted, said that when her father came home on Christmas evening her mother had gone to bed. He kept calling to her mother to come down, and at length said, "Come down stairs, or I will come up with a red-hot poker." Her father put the poker in the fire, and her mother came down. When she got down her father ran her through the belly with the red-hot poker."
Some versions state that Stanway didn't call a doctor for two days, during which time she lay in extreme agony and by the time help arrived, she had died. Other versions have him calling for a doctor (the next day) who was unable to do anything to save the victim. Reporters were not permitted to view the execution, but it's thought that hundreds of people watched the hoisting of the black flag following the exectution. Despite the evidence of what was a particularly horiffic crime it was reported by the South Wales Daily News that executioner Marwood was threatened by several of Stanway's relatives after the hanging.
1883: Patrick Carey
Samuel Carlam and his common-law wife Mary Mohan, kept a lodging house at Smallwood, a village just outside Congleton, Cheshire. On 9th February they were found battered to death at the house, which had also been robbed. A hammer was found beside the bodies. The police soon learned that a tramp had been seen in the area carrying a large bundle shortly after the robbery was discovered. Police arrested Patrick Carey who was a father of four, and also known as John (or Jack) White. He was tried and convicted at Chester Assizes and sentenced to death. The crime and trial were reported in the Aberystwyth Observer:
- "The prisoner was seen by several persons about the house until noon, and later he was seen leaving with a bundle tied in a shawl. Shortly afterwards a lodger returned to the house, and was horrified at discovering Earlam lying dead on the floor. The skull was literally battered in with a hammer, which lay near at hand. Mary Moran was found lying in the wash-house, suffering also from terrible injuries, to which she subsequently succumbed. Earlam's pockets had been rifled and a new suit of clothes was stolen belonging to a ledger. The prisoner escaped to Manchester, where he was arrested. The Jury, after five minutes' deliberation, found the prisoner Guilty, and his lordship sentenced him to death."
He was hanged by William Marwood in Chester on the 8th May 1883. As reported in the Weekly Mail on 12th May 1883:
- "On Tuesday morning at eight o'clock Patrick Carey, alias Jack White, was hung at Chester Castle for murdering Thomas Earlam and Mary Moran at Smallwood. Marwood was the executioner. The drop waa 8ft 6in. Death was instantaneous. Reporters were not admitted. Father Pacincus, Roman Catholic chaplain, says the man told him be was not afraid he repeated prayers after him, and died imploring mercy from above. The drawing of the bolt could be heard outside the prison."
The Aberdare Times gives a fuller report:
- "On Tuesday morning, at eight o'clock, Patrick Carey, alias John White, was executed at Chester Castle Prison, for the murder of Thomas Earlam, a lodging-house keeper at Smallwood, and Mary Moran, his housekeeper. Marwood who had arrived in Chester on the previous night from Lincoln, visited the Castle at an early hour in the morning, and inspected the scaffold on which the condemned man was to be hanged. There was a considerable crowd outside the prison walls from about half-past seven o'clock. At about ten minutea to eight the bell of St. Mary's Church, which adjoins the prison, tolled, and remained tolling until after the execution. The black fiag was hoisted over the gate of the prison one minute after eight o'clock. The condemned man went to bed at his usual hour on Monday night, and slept very soundly. He rose and dressed at five o'clock, and at half-past five was visited by Father Pacificus, Roman Catholic chaplain, who has been ministerially attending the prisoner since his condemnation. The rev. father celebrated mass in a cell, and Carey received the Eucharist. At a few minutes to eight o'clock Marwood and the officials appeared at the condemned cell, and Carey was pinioned and led to the scaffold. The condemned man did not betray any trepidation, but walked firmly to the scaffold. He submitted his hands to be pinioned and his head to be covered by the hangman with the greatest coolness. The bolt was immediately drawn, and the drop being 8 feet, death appeared to be instantaneous. Reporters were not admitted to witness the execution, but immediately afterwards Father Pacificus volunteered the following informa* tion to the representatives of the press :— "I have just to say that Carey was resigned to the will of God and to his fate. He hoped that the Lord would have mercy upon him. and pardon all his past sics and crimes. He acknowledged the jnstice of the law, ard that he deserved death. I cannot but speak very highly of him. He died really penitent. He was very grateful to the governor and the officers of the gaol for their kindness to him. He submitted quietly to the process of pinioning, and when I, fearing that he might be alarmed, endeavoured to comfort him, be said, 'Don't trouble yourself farther. I am not afraid.' He said prayers for the recommendation of his soul to God as far as the scaffold, and then he repeated every prayer I was suggesting to him. At the last moment he requested to be allowed to kiss the crucifix I had in my hands. He did so, and then I kissed him, and we parted. His last words were a prayer for mercy, and he then went down without a struggle." Three masses, beginning at seven o'clock, were offered up for Carey at the Franciscan Church at Chester, and there was also an exposition of the Blessed Sacrament, which commenced about eight o'clock. An inquest was afterwards held at the Castle,"
In 1886 the scaffold was removed from Chester Castle and taken to Knutsford. Only eight executions took place there from 1886 to 1917 when the prison was handed over to the military.
Hoole Heath
Watkin, in his Roman Chester, identifies a "Gibbet Piece" in Mickle Trafford, which was probably not a place of execution, but a location where the bodies of executed criminals were put on display. He writes:
- "The road, which is perfectly straight, is only shewn for about half a mile on the Ordnance Map, which makes its direct line terminate soon after "Salter's Lane" is passed, but we found its course plainly traceable across the fields into Tyre's (or Tyrer's) Lane (which leads down to some low meadows) and into the "Gibbet Piece" where executions (and I believe interments) took place in the last and beginning of the present century, a clump of trees marking the spot."
Two 18th century highway men were gibbeted there (James Price and Thomas Brown) for the robbery of a mail boy. The gibbet was errected in 1796, especially for these two, and taken down in 1818. While awaiting execution we are informed that Brown "figured a coffin with the representation of a body in it on the wall of his cell, and wrote underneath the following lines:
- "BEHOLD the corpse within the coffin lies, / With stretch'dout limbs and closed eyes; / But, ah, poor Brown ! no coffin thou shalt have, / Nor yet a fhroud, nor yet a peaceful grave. / Prisoners all a warning by me take, / Repent in time, before it be too late; / Repent in time, leave off your thieving ways, Then you' shall all see happier days"
Price would achieve fame as according to "The Golden and Ghoulish Age of the Gibbet in Britain"
- "in the skull of James Price , gibbeted on "Trafford Green" , Cheshire, in 1796 was found the nest of a wren or a robin"
A wren, according to the Lancaster Gazette and General Advertiser for 2 May 1818 (issue 881), or of a robin, according to local legend.
Abbey Gateway
In August 1648 a Captain Oldham attempted to seize Chester for the king The plan however was discovered and the Captain and Lieutenant Ashton were shot in the Corn Market.
There was also at least one beheading by the Abbey Gate: that of the Royalist Sir Timothy Fetherstonhaugh who liberally contributed money to the royal cause, raised troops at his own expense, and served in the field. At the Battle of Wigan Lane, Lancashire, 26 August 1651, he was taken prisoner, and imprisoned at Chester Castle (from where he wrote a farewell letter to his wife). After trial by court-martial at Chester for "corresponding with Charles Stuart or his Party" he was beheaded and/or shot (versions vary) outside the Abbey Gate, 22 October 1651, despite his plea that he had quarter for life given him.
Other Gallows
By 1573 the point where the boundary of the City liberties crossed the Chester-Wrexham road was known as Hangman's hill, though the gallows which had once stood there had been removed.
Hangmen
In Elizabethan England, the death penalty applied for treason, murder, manslaughter, infanticide, rape, arson, grand larceny (theft of goods worth more than a shilling), highway robbery, buggery, sodomy and heresy. Hanging was the method used for all but treason, which was punished by drawing, hanging and quartering for men, burning for women, and beheading for the nobility; and heresy, which was punished by burning.
The Waltham Black Act of 1723 established the system known as the "Bloody Code" which imposed the death penalty for over 350, often petty, offences. It was passed in 1723 in response to a series of raids against landowners by two groups of poachers, known as the "Blacks" from their habit of blacking their faces when they undertook the raids. One group was active in Waltham. Prior to the passing of the Act there were approximately fifty crimes which could have led to execution. Hanging crimes included:
- "being in the company of Gypsies for one month";
- "strong evidence of malice in a child aged 7–14 years of age"; and
- "blacking the face or using a disguise whilst committing a crime".
Whilst executions for murder, burglary and robbery were common, the death sentences for minor offenders were often not carried out. A sentence of death could be commuted or respited (permanently postponed) for reasons such as benefit of clergy, official pardons, pregnancy of the offender or performance of military or naval duty. Between 1770 and 1830, an estimated 35,000 death sentences were handed down in England and Wales, of which 7,000 executions were carried out.
In 1823, the Judgement of Death Act 1823 made the death penalty discretionary for all crimes except treason and murder. Gradually during the middle of the nineteenth century the number of capital offences was reduced, and by 1861 was down to five: Murder, Arson in the Royal Dockyards, Espionage, Piracy with Violence and Treason. The last execution in the UK took place in 1964, and the death penalty was legally abolished in the following years.
Chester's hangmen were, like many who held the same position elsewhere, a rather strange lot, as might be expected of someone whose paid employment is judicial murder, often in front of a crowd.
Samuel Burrows
33-37 Clwyd Street, Ruthin was once a public house called the Red Lion, where an executioner almost met an untimely death. A man named John Connor was executed in Ruthin for highway robbery on 15th April 1822. The executioner was Samuel Burrows, the hangman for Chester and evidently fond of a drink. The evening before the execution he was staying in the Red Lion where his fellow patrons convinced him to demonstrate the process of hanging a person. Attaching his rope to the ceiling, he showed them how to tie the noose and put it around his own neck. A man named Henry Caddock kicked the stool from underneath the hangman and he would have strangled had Thomas Humphreys not swiftly cut the rope.
Burrows was apparently a stickler for moral behaviour, having ensured that his own son was brought to justice for theft. The young Charles was given seven years transportation and spent some time in the prison hulks on the Thames before being shipped off to Van Dieman's Land. Burrows would never see him again. His executions were sometimes "bungled" because he placed the knot at the back of his victim's head, leading to strangulation. It is generally thought that Burrows was a little too fond of a drink and on the evening before executions he was sometimes locked in police cells to prevent him getting inebriated and making a mess of the next day's business.
Burrows is said to have performed 58 executions at the New City Gaol between 1802 and 1834. This presents a slight problem as the City Gaol was only constrcted in 1807. In reality he seems to have conducted 48 executions at Chester with the other ten being elsewhere. Only six of the 58 were for murder. He executed Edith Morrey on the 23rd of April 1813 for the murder of her husband. He had also hanged her boyfriend, John Lomas on the 24th of August 1812, for his part in the killing. His last job was also his biggest one, the quadruple hanging at Chester on the 19th of April 1834 when he hanged Thomas Riley for cutting and maiming, John Carr and William Naylor for shooting with intent to murder, and James Mason for procuring an abortion. The proceedings were something of a farce, with Burrows possibly having been on the bottle beforehand. All four men went simultaneously into the air dangling and strangling and one even managed to briefly get his feet on the wood of the scaffold.
He also worked at Shrewsbury and Hereford on occasions. He was born on the 28th of June 1772 and had been a butcher, surgeons assistant, a member of the naval press-gang and finally a rat-catcher by profession. The job of hangman was paid by a fee for each "job" and at times Burrows would go for years without a hanging. He died "of a liver complaint" on the 20th of October 1835 at his home near Gorse Stacks in Chester. He is buried in St Oswald.
William Calcraft
William Calcraft (11 October 1800 – 13 December 1879) was a 19th-century English hangman, one of the most prolific of British executioners. It is estimated in his 45-year career he carried out 450 executions. A cobbler by trade, Calcraft was initially recruited to flog juvenile offenders held in Newgate Prison. While selling meat pies on streets around the prison, Calcraft met the City of London's hangman, John Foxton. After Foxton's death in 1829 the government appointed Calcraft the official Executioner for the City of London and Middlesex. Following this, his executioner services were in great demand throughout England. Nevertheless, some considered Calcraft incompetent, in particular for his controversial use of the "short-drop" hanging method in which the condemned were slowly strangled to death. Because with Calcraft's methods the condemned took 10-20 minutes to die, to hasten death Calcraft would sometimes dramatically pull on legs or climb on shoulders in an effort to break a victim's neck. It has been speculated that Calcraft used these methods partly to entertain the crowds, sometimes numbering 30,000 spectators or more. Although as a younger man Calcraft had been considered to be "genial", with a love of breeding rabbits, in his later years he was described as "surly and sinister-looking, with long hair and beard, in scruffy black attire and a fob chain".
George Smith
Smith gravitated from petty criminal – he was once jailed for running naked through the streets – to England’s best-known hangmen. Smith learned his trade as an assistant to William Calcraft. His first engagement as Calcraft's assistant was the public execution of James Owen and George Thomas outside Stafford Gaol. Smith was a prisoner at Stafford at the time of Owen and Thomas' execution, and Calcraft appointed Smith for the task because his regular assistant “Old Cheese” Cheshire had turned up drunk.
He hanged Mary Gallop at Chester Gaol on the 28th December 1844 for killing her father. George Smith was renowned for his long white coat and top hat which he wore at all his public hangings. He was popularly known as "Throttler Smith".
George Smith hanged 20 men and 1 woman during his time as the Public hangman. After ceasing to be Public Hangman he hanged a further three men at Chester Gaol. George Smith’s most famous solo execution was that of the Rugeley poisoner, Dr. William Palmer for the murder of John Parsons Cook (and possibly many others). Palmer’s execution outside Stafford Gaol on June 14, 1856, attracted more than 30,000 people and Smith, always with an eye on a quick buck, later flogged pieces of the noose for half-a-crown each. He took a macabre sideshow to Chester Races where punters paid a shilling to watch the final moments of Palmer’s life re-enacted, with the help of a tailor’s dummy.
He conducted his last hanging on Auhust 13, 1872, when he executed Christoper Edwards, who had killed his wife. Details of the hangman’s life afterwards are sketchy, although it is believed he died in 1874. Some say that, submerged in debt, he took his own life.
William Marwood
William Marwood (1818 – 4 September 1883) was a hangman for the British government. He developed the technique of hanging known as the "long drop". At the age of 54 he persuaded the governor of Lincoln Castle Gaol to allow him to conduct an execution. The efficient way in which he conducted the hanging of William Frederick Horry without a hitch on 1 April 1872 assisted him in being appointed hangman by the Sheriffs of London and Middlesex in 1874, in succession to William Calcraft, at a retainer of £20 a year plus £10 per execution. Marwood developed the "long drop" technique of hanging, which ensured that the prisoner's neck was broken instantly at the end of the drop, resulting in the prisoner dying of asphyxia while unconscious. Instead of everyone falling the same standard distance, the person's height and weight were used to determine how much slack would be provided in the rope so that the distance dropped would be enough to ensure that the neck was broken, but not so much that the person was decapitated. This was considered more humane than the slow death by strangulation caused by the "short drop" method, which was particularly distressing to prison governors and staff who were required to witness executions at close quarters following the abolition of public executions by the Capital Punishment Amendment Act 1868. Marwood was one of two executioners to give their name to the character of the hangman in the British Punch and Judy puppet show (Jack Ketch being the better known one).
Sources and Links
Related Pages
Online
Lists of Executions
- Executions In Chester, Cheshire – Between 1658 & 1829;
- Classic British Murders: Cheshire Murder cases from history;
- Public Executions In Chester From 16th Century as listed by the Museum of Policing in Cheshire;
- Executions in Cheshire;
Other Sources
- The Execution of Criminals in Cheshire;
- Cheshire Archives and Local Studies QAB/5/8: Death Warrants - Warrants directed to the sheriff and constable of Chester Castle by the clerk to the crown for the execution of criminals sentenced at the Court of Session, or Assizes.
- 1837 - 1868 Public executions;
- An Account of the Life, Conversion, and Death of Mary Gallop: Who was Executed at Chester, for Parricide, December 28th, 1844;
- The Phrenological Journal and Magazine of Moral Science from the year 1846;
- 'Obnoxious, drunk' George Smith;
- Pigot on Chester Infirmary;
- Crime and Justice in Georgian Chester;
- Post Office Notices: for mail robberies;
- Harnessing the Power of the Criminal Corpse;
