Parishes

"Ancient Parishes" of Chester are the group of parishes that existed roughly within the period of 1200–1800. Initially, the ancient parishes had only an ecclesiastical function, but reforms initiated by King Henry VIII, and developed by Queen Elizabeth, meant that the Vestry Committees of the parishes became responsible for some aspects of civil administration e.g. the new Poor Relief Law, and, for a time, maintaining the highways which passed through the parish boundaries. This role was expanded by later legislation and led them to acquire various secular functions that eventually led to a split between the ecclesiastical parishes and the purely civil parishes that exist today. However for a long period of history the smallest administrative units of society were the parish, the township and the manor. This article looks, as an example, at the township of Hoole in the parish of Plemstall but much the same analysis can be done for any rural parish ex-rural parish.

One thing to note is that the bounaries of a parish often change over time. After 1800 the movement of people into larger towns and cities, and the general growth of populations led to an increase in the number of "parish" churches and the establishment of "Conventional Districts" (see note at end below). In adition, it is not unknown for parishes to have been combined in the past.

History


The word "parish" which is the English equivalent of the Latin "parochia" and the Greek "paroikia", has been used by the Church since its very early days to denote a primary organisational unit. At first, during the spread of christianity in the later Roman empire, this would have been located in a city and would have defined a community rather than a geography. By the opening of the 4th century, christianity was spreading to the countryside, which was quite literally inhabited by "pagans". Minsters were established as centers of ministry, but in early times there were no parish boundaries as such - the religious community was too thinly spread and many preists and preaches would be itinerant. The minsters were sometimes staffed by monks living under a rule or secular clerks leading a semi-community life. Village churches were few and far between before the ninth century and very little is known about their organisation. The majority of "Ancient Parish" churches in England originated as the personal property of (predominantly lay) patrons; who had the right to appoint and dismiss the parish priest, to receive an entrance fee on appointment, and to charge an annual rent thereafter.

Each such ecclesiastical parish was administered by a parish priest, specifically Rector, Vicar or Perpetual Curate depending on if the original set up of the rectory had become lay or disappropriated meaning its medieval rectorial property rights had been sold or bestowed on another body such as an abbey. The legal right to appoint or recommend a parish priest is called an advowson, and its possessor is known as a patron. Each such right in each parish was mainly first held by the lord of the principal manor. The creation of an advowson was a secondary development arising from the process of creating parishes across England in the 11th and 12th centuries, with their associated parish churches. A major impetus to this development was the legal exaction of agricultural tithes specific to the support of churches and their clergy; landowners needed to establish parish churches on their lands in order to retain tithe income within their estates and prevent it being spent or dispersed elesewhere, and to this purpose sought to raise former field churches to parish church status. This was generally performed by a lord of a manor by rebuilding a church within the boundary of his manor, or within that of a newly subinfeudated manor, and then transferring proprietary rights of certain individual named fields, mills or messuages (i.e. houses on the manor which earned rents) to establish a glebe, land from which the parish church could benefit directy.

The lord of the manor, having incurred a very great expense in building the church and parsonage and having suffered a loss of income due to his donation of property to the glebe, quite reasonably insisted on the right to select the individual who would act as parish priest, from which office he could soon not be ejected by the lord until the priest's death. The bishop, without whose consecration the new church would have no religious and spiritual stature, in turn demanded the right of confirmation of the appointment. Thus from the earliest time the advowson was "appurtenant to" the manor, that is to say it appertained to the manor and was exercisable by the lord. The advowson, being real property could be "alienated" (i.e. disposed of) by sale or gift of the patron, but with special licence from the overlord as was required for the alienation of the manor itself.

By various reforms almost all these rights were extinguished for lay patrons, who were able only to retain the residual power to nominate the rector to a benefice, and many lay notables thereupon gave up parish churches into the ownership of religious houses, which were less inhibited by canon law from extracting fees and rents from rectors. Initially it had not been unusual for religious houses in possession of rectories also to assume the capability to collect tithe and glebe income for themselves, but this practice was banned by the decrees of the Lateran Council of 1215.

In the pre-Reformation church, a rector and was in contrast to a vicar, a cleric whose revenue is usually, at least partially, appropriated by a larger organisation (such as an abbey) to whom the vicar functioned as a "vicarious" assistant and representative.

Tithes
Tithes are first mentioned in a constitutional decree, made in a synod held A.D. 786. Upon their first introduction, though every man was obliged to pay tithes in general, he might give them to whatever priests he pleased, or he might pay them into the hands of the bishop. In time, the tithes of a parish became the legal property of the person who held the office of rector. The rector did not have to be an ordained man — it might well be a college, bishop, a nobleman, or even a female. The rector was simply the one who received the ‘greater’ tithes, 10% of the cereal crops grown in the parish, (which might be as much as 75% of the total tithes), in compensation for the freehold (land) used by the church. The tithes were not the property of his vicar, who is not an office-holder but an employee, remunerated by a stipend, i.e. a salary, payable by his employer the rector.

Tithes were paid for every thing that yields an annual increase, such as corn, hay, hops, fruit, wood, cattle with calves, horses with foals, poultry, and the like, and for eggs, wool or milk and suchlike; but not for any thing that is of the "substance of the earth", or is not of annual increase, such as stone, lime, and the like; nor were they payable for creatures that are of a wild nature, such as deer and hawks. Personal industry resulted in tithes, as of manual occupations, trades, corn-milling, fisheries, and the like; and of these the tenth part of the clear gains and profits was due.

In the Reformation of the 16th century, the Dissolution of the Monasteries led to the transfer of much monastic property back to laymen, and with the properties passed the advowsons which the monasteries had held: thus creating a large group of lay patrons (impropriators) who were thus entitled to tithes. These lay purchasers of the tithing rights could not themselves fulfil the spiritual obligations of a parochial cure, and nor was it considered proper that they appoint stipendiary priests for the function, as the canons had done. Instead lay purchasers of appropriated tithes, were required in these instances both to nominate a clergyman to the diocesan bishop to serve the cure, and also to provide a fixed stipend of appropriate annual value to support the new perpetual curacy. In practice, most of the nominated incumbents to the new perpetual curacies were the canons or stipendiaries who had been serving those cures before the dissolution. In 1603, there were an estimated 3849 livings in the hands of lay impropriators out of a total of 9284. Termed ecclesiastical pluralism some parish priests held more than one parish living (benefice), traditionally placing a possibly temporary curate in charge of those where they did not reside.

A rector received direct payment of both the greater and lesser tithes of his parish, whilst a vicar received only the lesser tithes (the greater tithes going to the lay holder, or impropriator, of the living). A curate held the Cure of souls in an area which had not yet been formally or legally constituted as a parish, and received neither greater nor lesser tithes, but only a small stipend in return for his duties. Perpetual curates (the title was abolished in 1868, after which they became vicars) tended to have a lower social status, and were often quite poorly remunerated with the "living" sometimes being described as "a starving". Any distinct status that perpetual curates had in law was abolished in 1968. The traditional titles of rector and vicar continue in English use today, although the roles and the conditions of employment of the two titles are now essentially the same. Which of the titles is held by the parish priest is largely historical, some parishes having a rector and others a vicar. Owing to the origins of the terms, parishes with a rector are often of more notable historical importance or prominence than parishes with a vicar.

The amount of tithe generated by a parish varied according to it’s size and agricultural practices and this resulted in massive disparities in clerical incomes, indeed in 1704 a special fund – Queen Anne’s Bounty - had to be set up to help poor clergy. It was found that just under a half of all clergymen earned eighty pounds a year or less, whilst others earned thousands of pounds. Considering the average agricultural wage in the early 1800’s was about £25 per year this was still generous. The bounty was originally funded by the annates monies: "first fruits" (the first year's income of a cleric newly appointed to a benefice) and "tenths" – a tenth of the income in subsequent years traditionally paid by English clergy to the pope until the Reformation, and thereafter to the Crown.

By the early 19th century tithe payment in kind seemed a very out-of-date practice, while payment of tithes per se became unpopular, against a background of industrialisation, religious dissent and agricultural depression. The 1836 Tithe Commutation Act required tithes in kind to be converted to more convenient monetary payments called tithe rent-charge. The Tithe Survey was established to find out which areas were subject to tithes, who owned them, how much was payable and to whom. The first task of the Tithe Commissioners appointed to oversee the administration of the Act was to discover to what extent commutation had already taken place. Enquiries were directed to every parish or township listed in the census returns. The results of these enquiries are in the tithe files, which cover the whole of England and Wales, and not only those places where tithes remained uncommuted by 1836. For parishes where tithes were still being paid in kind, the land had to be surveyed and valued, to arrive at total parish rent-charge figures, and to calculate each individual landowner’s liability to pay tithe. Assistant tithe commissioners travelled to these parishes to hold meetings with parishioners about valuations, and to settle the terms of the commutation of their tithes. Thus, the tithe maps represent the end of the era of tithes-in-kind, but not the end of tithes in the form of a rent-charge.



Chester Parishes
For the City of Chester, and some detached portions the nine ancient parishes were: Holy Trinity (inc. the Blacon part of Blacon cum Crabwall), St Bridget, St Johns, St Martin, St Mary on the Hill (inc Claverton, Little Mollington, Marlston cum Lache, Moston, Gloverstone and greater part of Upton.), St Michael, St Olave, St Oswald (inc. Bache, Croughton, Great Boughton, Iddinshall, Newton by Chester, Wervin, the Crabwall part of Blacon cum Crabwall, part of Upton, and the islands of Hilbre and Little Eye in the Dee Estuary) and St Peter. St John had no townships which were dependent upon this parish, but it did contain 16 fields that were part of Hoole. St Oswald had a chapelry of Bruera which included Churton Heath, Huntington, Lea Newbold and Saighton. Chester Castle was extra-parochial, as was Little St John which in 1778 contained Bluecoat Hospital, Northgate Gaol, and six almshouses. Other places not in an ancient parish included Spital Boughton and the Cathedral precincts. Se the links below for information on how the intra-mural parishes of Chester developed over time.

Chester's "nine" medieval parishes were not mapped until 1833, but there is no reason to suppose that the boundaries as then defined were substantially different from those of 1200, by which date all the churches were in existence. The parishes of St. Michael, St. Olave, and St. Peter lay within the medieval walls, and St. Martin's almost entirely so. St. Bridget's was partly extramural but confined to the liberties. Holy Trinity and St. John's extended beyond the liberties, and St. Mary's and St. Oswald's far beyond them. The partly extramural detached portion of St. Martin's parish in the Crofts may originally have been the parish of a tenth church, St Chad's, which had disappeared before the Reformation. Of course the picture is not as clear-cut as when described briefly: the chapel of St. Thomas the Martyr without Northgate, was the site of the Abbey’s Leet Court for its tenants, and did not achieve parish status until 1871 while St. Oswald’s was a late Saxon chapel within the Abbey, from which it was not distinguished by name until the later 13th century, or by territory until 1509, at which date St. Oswald’s became a parish, and the Abbey precinct an extra parochial area.

The evolution of the parishes in Chester and the final shape of their boundaries have been plausibly explained as the successive subdivision of territories attached to the two oldest foundations, St. Oswald's and St. John's, as new churches were established from the 10th century onwards (see links below). Some of the city parishes had extramural portions with St Oswald's including townships in three different "hundreds". One complication in Chester was the presence of two large religious institutions: the college of St Werburgh (later the abbey and later still the cathedral) and St Johns which had briefly been a cathedral in Norman times. Both these institutions were at times linked to weatlthy benefactors.

As an example of a rural parish this article considers the ancient parish of Plemstall. This comprises the townships of Hoole, Mickle-Trafford, Bridge-Trafford and Pickton. The original church at Plemstall was built in the 12th century but the present building dates mostly from the 15th century. Inscriptions in the church show that there were restorations in 1684, 1711, 1802–03 and 1819.

The hundreds were the geographic divisions of Cheshire for administrative, military and judicial purposes. They were introduced in Cheshire some time before the Norman conquest. Later on, both the number and names of the hundreds changed by processes of land being lost from Cheshire, and merging or disaggregation of remaining hundreds. The Ancient parishes of Cheshire were usually wholly within a specific hundred, although a few of the extramural ones (such as Plemstall) were divided between at least two hundreds: Picton and Mickle Trafford being in Willaston Hundred and Bridge Trafford being in Roelau. It is reasonable to assume that parishes in two or more hundreds predate the existence of hundreds. Over the years the initial hundreds consolidated to just seven with losses to Wales and changed names: Broxton (most of Dudestan and part of Willaston), Bucklow (Bochelau and Tunendune), Eddisbury (Riseton and Roelau), Macclesfield (Hamestan), Nantwich (Warmundestrou), Northwich (Middlewich) and Wirral (Willaston). The date at which this process happened is not clear: These newer names are reported to be all in use by 1259 to 1260. Plemstall was still split (mostly along the Gowy) between the Broxton Hundred (Picton and Mickle Trafford) and the Eddisbury Hundred (Bridge Trafford}.

It is often said that the boundaries of rural ancient parishes reflect those of Anglo-Saxon manors. This is true to some extent, but a parish might comprise several townshops and manors such that only a portion of the manor boundary became a parish boundary. Clearly this is not true of urban parishes, as in Chester where the interlocking of the intra-mural parish boundaries can be quite complex on a very small scale. In Cheshire and some other northern counties the number of townships per ancient parish is often three or more which is somewhat higher than in the south of the country where the average is less than two. No single explanation suffices to provide for this difference but it may be something to do with the influence of the Celtic as opposed to the Roman tradition in the early church. Apart from in the old diocese of Lichfield and that of St Asaph the large, multi-township parish appears to be restricted to the province of York. Cheshire has some parishes with a very large number of townships, including Great Budworth (35), Prestbury (32) and Malpas (24).



Charters and other documents can provide much detailed information on parish boundaries but one useful starting point is often the Domesday survey, which is widely available in English translation online and Tithe maps. For Plemstall we can rapidly learn the following.

Mickle-Trafford is mentioned in Domesday as belonging to the Hundred of Willaston and in the lordship of Earl Hugh of Chester. It had a recorded population of 8 households comprising 4 villagers, 2 smallholders and 2 slaves. There were 6 ploughlands with 2 lord's plough teams and 1 men's plough teams. There is no mention of any pasture or meadow. It had previously belonged to Ording of Trafford. It had a value of 2 pounds in 1086 reduced from 5 pounds in 1066.

Bridge-Trafford is mentioned in Domesday as being in the Hundred of Roelua. It had a recorded population of 7 households in 1086, although details are only given as "1 smallholder, 4 slaves, 1 female slave, 1 men" and that there is ploughland for one lords team and one acre of meadow. The Tenant-in-chief in 1086 was the canons of Chester St Werburgh, who appear to held it since before the conquest, possibly charging a toll on the bridge. The annual value to its lord was 8 shillings in 1086 up from 5 shillings in 1066.

Picton in Domesday was the land of Richard of Vernon and had six households comprising 3 smallholders, 2 other population and 1 "riders". The ploughland consited of 3 ploughlands with 1 lord's plough team and 1 men's plough team. There was a meadow of 0.5 acres. It had previously belonged to Toki of Picton. Toki (or Tochi) appears to be a scandinavian name and is either a short form of names in Þórkell or possibly a pet-form of name in Þór- "the god’s name Þórr" with the addition of the suffix -ki. Picton was also in the Hundred of Willaston. It had a value of 1 pound in 1086; 5 shillings when acquired by the 1086 owner, reduced from 2 pounds in 1066. Toki also seems to have held land in Elton, Guilden Sutton, Hooton, Manley, and Norton. The lands were distrubuted after the Conquest as follows - to William fitzNigel: Norton; to Earl Hugh: Manley and Elton; to Richard of Vernon: Hooton and Pickton and to Robert fitzHugh: Sutton.

For Plemstall, as in many other places, the three manors mentioned above only represent a part of a more complex picture. The estate of Flookersbrook, lay partly in Newton and partly in Hoole. This estate, was held by the Massey family of Kelsall, and existed before 1450. It later passed to the Bruens of Tarvin and then the Sneyds, before being bought after 1538 by Sir Laurence Smith of Hough (d. 1582). Flookersbrook Hall, still held by the Smiths but then at lease, was destroyed in the Civil War and the estate was later sold to the Anderson family before being broken up in the 18th century. Hoole, together with Mickle Trafford was a component of the FitzAlan earls of Arundel's manor of Dunham on the Hill, it descended with the latter through the Troutbecks, who purchased it in the early 15th century, and thence by marriage c. 1510 to Sir John Talbot, ancestor of the Talbot earls of Shrewsbury. The earls of Shrewsbury held Hoole Lodge, then considered to be the ancient manor house, in the early 19th century, and were lords of the manor until the 1930s, although they had ceased to be significant landowners by the 1920s. In the 13th and 14th centuries the Hoole or Holes family, which included a city sheriff in the 1280s, were mesne lords of the manor and probably resident, though by the late 14th century they had a mansion instead near Chester castle. They are not heard of after the mid 15th century. By the 1450s the Bunbury family of Stanney resided at Hoole Hall, but the house was destroyed in the Civil War and the Bunburys sold their Hoole estate in 1757. The purchasers, the Baldwins, established a new hall.

It is not at all clear which hundred Hoole was in. Guilden Sutton was a settlement in the hundred of Willaston. as was Upton, but Newton was in the separate "Hundred of Chester". In 1354 the liberties of Chester were defined with reference to the original Chester Hundred and included the city of Chester, the "Bishop's Borough" and "Redcliff" to its east, Newton to the north-east, and Handbridge and "Lee" (later Netherleigh and Overleigh) south of the river Dee. The "Bishops Borough" appears to have been to the east of the city and is noted in Domesday as "The Bishop's Borough outside the City" ("episcopi burgus extra civitatem").



Extra-mural Parish Boundaries
Parish boundaries are marked on maps with varying degrees of detail. In general (but not always) these boundaries stayed stable for in some cases hundreds of years, but in recent times there has been much combination and sub-division (see the example of Hoole below). Hedges were an early form of boundary as were natural streams and man-made ditches. In some places the boundary is now simply a track or pathway, but may have once been followed by a hedge. Where a boundary run along a road which need to be maintained it will often run along one side of the road so that it is clear which parish is responsible for upkeep.

The terminology used on maps can be confusing but the following abbreviations are fairly common. "4ft R. H." means four feet from the "root of the hedge", indicating that the planter of the hedge has ensured that the hedge is set back from the actual boundary to allow it to grow without taking land from the neighbour. On modern maps this may be written as "1.22m RH". The distance differs between 3ft and 5ft depending on which parish the land lies within. "C.Tk.D" means the center of the track of a ditch (or drain), with similar for stream (C.Tk.S). "CS" may also be used for the mid-line of a stream, and "CCS" for the centre of a covered stream. "FW" is "follows wall" and is obviously associated with a more modern landscape. "Und" is used for boundaries which are "undefined": one where there was no real-world feature to align the boundary to when it was surveyed. "Def" does not mean defined, but rather "defaced", meaning that the original feature that the boundary was aligned to no longer exists: often this was probably a hedge that was removed. Where one type of boundary stops and another starts this is often indicated by a short line with a circle at each end. The most notable boundary marker is often the boundary stone (marked on maps as "BS"): these are also the most expensive to install and may have a special history associated with them, such as memorial stones for mayoral "beating of the bounds".

25 inch maps give a particularly detailed record. The show all public boundaries, including civil parishes, municipal wards, as well as burgh and county boundaries. Field names were omitted after 1888. That said, in general, only the names of fields which are of particular importance or historical significance (such as open fields, "ings" or glebe land) were collected and recorded before and after this date. Individual field names were never systematically recorded, but after 1888 there was clearer official guidance to OS surveyors to not publish field names. The new Ordnance Survey Archaeological Officer, appointed in 1920, led to improved recording of antiquities on Ordnance Survey maps from this time. The 25 inch maps record acreages of all land parcels. Land parcels were numbered consecutively within each parish, and acreages of fields were recorded in separate Parish Area Books or Books of Reference. Those counties surveyed before 1879 often include land use information. The 25 inch maps record acreages of all land parcels on the map below each parcel number (with varying degrees of accuracy). On the map 1.0018 square inches on the map sipposedly equals one acre on the ground. From 1889 until ca. 1907, built up areas for which were too detailed for individual land parcels were edged by a yellow band, and the acreage shown for this wider area. From 1897 to 1909, stipple bands were used. Smaller land parcels were sometimes grouped together through the long 'S' (or "brace" symbol) crossing over parcel boundaries, with the acreage given for the total of the land parcels.

Bounds of Hoole
Neither the township of Hoole nor the parish of Plemstall are mentioned in Domesday, but there is suggestive evidence that the parish of Plemstall is based on an ancient foundation. These include the likely association with it of Plegmund and the fact that while there is a church at Plemstall there has never been a township associated with it, and yet the parish is moderately extensive in terms of area. The township lies immediately outside the liberties of the city of Chester from which it was separated by the original course of Flookersbrook.

The actual bounds of the township of Hoole have varied over the years, especially as it has lost portions to the City and gained parts of Newton. The bounds from the Tithe Map may however be traced using the 25-inch OS maps.

The circuit of the bounds of Hoole can be started at the former site of Flookersbrook bridge (see fig 1.). This was located in line with Brook Street and was situated near the entrance of the present railway car park (map). The course of Flookersbrook has been much altered and it now flows in a covered culvert to the north of its original course. From here the township boundary headed NE along the stream which flows through the Flookersbrook plantation and into Flookersbrook itself, formerly the site of "St Annes Lakes", and stays to the west of what was once a drovers road and is now Hoole Road. The Tithe Map and the 25-inch maps differ as regards the location of the boundary, with the Tithe Maps having the boundaries running along the edge of St Anne's lakes while the 25-inch shows the boundary running through the center of where the lakes once lay.

The boundary joins edge of the modern Hoole Road a little short of Newton Lane, and follows this almost as far as Hoole Cottage, passing a boundary stone on the way. This meant that there was a small sliver of Hoole on the Newton side of what is now Hoole Road. This is probably explained by the actual boundary being the edge of a drovers track that existed prior to the turnpike and was somewhat wider. The original route from Chester to Manchester through Frodsham and Warrington followed what was a Roman road to cross the Mersey by Warrington bridge. In the 1370s the road left Chester by the Northgate and turned right along Bag Lane (later George Street), but later the route went from the Eastgate along Cow Lane, a road which in the 19th century was successively renamed Warrington Street and Frodsham Street. Beyond Flookersbrook bridge the original course was along the line later taken by Kilmorey Park, Newton Hollows, Mannings Lane, and the Street as far as Trafford Bridge. The road was realigned through the villages of Hoole and Mickle Trafford when it was turnpiked as far as the existing turnpike at Warrington in 1786. It was disturnpiked in two parts in 1870 and 1883.

At Hoole Cottage (see fig 2.), the township boundary swings away from the modern road, possibly again following the edge of a widening of the original drovers road as it approaches what may have been the last remnant of Hoole Heath. These "funnels" at each end of the drover track would have made herding of cattle more convenient. There was a boundary stone near Rose Cottage. It then followed a hedge to where the modern Greenfield Lane crosses the cycle-path. At this point it turns to follow the southern edge of Greenfield Lane until a point just past the junction with Mannings Lane, where there was once a boundary stone. Here the Tithe Map shows that a short section of lane protruded into the adjacent township. This occurs at several points on the bounds of Hoole but in very few other places on the Cheshire Tithe Maps set.

From here the boundary follows the track of the former Roman road NNE, but is spaced away from the current road by what have now become a series of plots to the west of the course of the Roman road. Such plots are known as "Slangs" and respresnt the cleared area on which the Roman road was centered. Encroachments into this from differing sides can add slight kinks or a slight wavy character to the original straight track of a Roman road. Reference to LIDAR often shows the original width of a Roman road as compared with a modern lane.

The boundary skirts around the hedge surrounding Field House until it reaches the location of another boundary stone, from where it heads NE along the line of a thick hedge. Originally the boundary met a narrow lane at a small pond but both of these are now beneath the motorway. From here the boundary followed the lane or track NNW and then NNE following a conspicuous curved line which is part hedge and part ditch until it returns to cross the line of the Roman road. For one part of this curve the boundary follows Picton Gorse Lane. The curve appears to be on a contour and therefore the ditch may have been purpose dug as a boundary marker rather than being a natural drain. At the point where it crosses the Street there is a slight kink in the roadway where the "slang" shifts from one side to the other.

From here the boundary is straight for some distance (next to the Acid Tar Lagoon, a former clay-pit). Here the boundary marks that between Hoole and the adjacent township of Mickle Trafford. At the crossing of the A56 there was a boundary stone. After the A56, and possibly before, it is in a large part following the center of the course of a track marked on some maps as "Garner's Lane". Garner's lane is little more than a footpath in places and meets the border with Guilden Sutton at the end of what is clearly an ancient "Green Lane" that is effectively a continuation of Guilden Sutton Lane and Hoole Lane. However, the age of Garner's Lane is attested to by the mature trees growing on either side of it and the high biodiversity.

The Green Lane is a very extensive boundary feature which, including its continuation forms the entire boundary between Mickle Trafford and Guilden Sutton. In fact, the boundaries of Mickle Trafford and Picton, two of the other townships making up the parish of Plemstall are relatively simple, being defined by the original course of the River Gowy to the north, a ditch running from a spring near Acres Lane to the west and the aforementioned Green Lane. The boundary between Mickle Trafford and Picton is defined by the Roman Road and a drain running into the Gowy. Bridge Trafford, to the north of the Gowy has quite a complex boundary and was probably once combined with Wimbolds Trafford.

The boundary of Hoole township then follows the edge of Guilden Sutton Lane to the SW (the lane itself is in the parish of Guilden Sutton) until it reaches a point which would once have marked the continuation of Greenfield Lane, (see fig 3) where it turns SE to eventually meet Hare lane.

So far, the boundary has followed a series of linear and curvi-linear features which comprise a stream, the edge of what was probably once heathland, drovers tracks, ditches and other trackways. Southwest of Hare Lane the boundary becomes more complex, following a zig-zag line along what were once field edges. This is despite there being some linear features which could have been followed, including the former Brook Lane. These form the boundary with the adjoining township of Great Boughton which is in the parish of St Oswald. Just when the boundary was fixed along this zig-zag isn't clear, but it may not have been the original boundary of the township. The zig-zag ends when the boundary reaches the site of the former Hoole Lane Farm where it turns SSW and its course is hidden beneath modern housing. The course of the boundary here was marked by a hedge and there was once a boundary stone marking the point where it joins the boundary of St Johns parish (see below).

When the boundary reaches the former course of Flookersbrook it turns west to follow the stream back to the starting point at Flookersbrook bridge. In some places the course of this stream has obviously been modified and in places the boundary follows the initial meandering track whereas in others it follows what appears to be a section which has been converted into a straight ditch. There are some boundary stones marked along the stream here - notably where the line of the stream co-incide before and after straightening.

The map of the township of Hoole also shows another boundary which is that of the "parish" of St Johns which includes a corner of Hoole township. This boundary can be seen to have had some influence on the topography of Hoole by constraining building plots and possibly controling the alignment of some roads and alleyways. Sources are divided as to whether St Johns either simply owned land in Hoole or actually conducted some parochial functions.

Later Parish Boundaries
In Hoole, as in many places there were significant parish boundary changes after 1800. In the 1880s the intramural boundaries of the older parishes were rationalized. Within the walls St. Peter's was enlarged, while St. Oswald's and St. Mary's became wholly extramural when parochial functions were transferred to new churches built in the suburbs north of the city and in Handbridge. Further changes were made in 1960 when St. Peter's parish was again enlarged and Holy Trinity became wholly extramural, the city-centre church being replaced by one in Blacon. In 1967 Little St. John's, which had acquired parochial functions, was united with St. Oswald's parish. More significantly, under a Church Commissioners' Scheme of 1972 a united Chester parish for the central part of the city was created by merging the parishes of St. John, St. Oswald with Little St. John, Christ Church, St. Bridget with St. Martin, St. Peter, and St. Michael with St. Olave. That scheme left the outer suburbs in the independent parishes of Holy Trinity without the Walls (Blacon), Lache cum Saltney, St. Mary without the Walls (Handbridge), St. Paul (Boughton), and Hoole, to which a new parish for Plas Newton was added (by dividing Hoole parish) in 1982.

The ancient parish of Chester St John was partly within the urban area of Chester, but, according to one source, it also comprised until 1843 part of the township of Hoole (the rest in Plemstall ancient parish). The "parish boundaries" of Hoole had also undergone some earlier changes. The new ecclesiastical chapelry's of Chester Christ Church and of Boughton St Paul were created about 1840 (one source gives 1843 for Christ Church and 1846 for St Paul; another states that the Christ Church registers and the St Paul registers begin in 1838). All Saints Hoole was built in 1867 as a chapel to Chester: Christ Church. In 1872 it became the district church for the township of Newton by Chester and part of the township of Hoole (i.e. that previously served by Chester: Christ Church).

Technically Hoole All Saints is not a parish church but the church of a Conventional District, i.e. a defined area placed under the care of a curate in charge (called the Minister of the Conventional District) with a district church council, by agreement between the incumbent(s) and bishop. They are not parishes but can have all the apparatus of a parish.

In 2015 changes were made to the Civil Parish boundaries: the Bridge Trafford, Hoole Village, Mickle Trafford, Picton and Wimbolds Trafford group of parishes were dissolved and the existing Parish Council of Mickle Trafford and District was wound up, while a new civil parish of Mickle Trafford and District was created. It is perhaps unfortunate that the name "Plemstall" no longer appears in the civil parish name.

Related Pages

 * Flookersbrook: for the boundaries of Chester overall;
 * Plegmund: for some informatiom on the parish;
 * Hoole: for a general discussion of the township;

Online

 * Hedgerow dating: a huge subject on its own but only an approximate method;
 * Parish and Township in Cheshire and North-East Wales;
 * ASPECTS OF THE TOPOGRAPHY OF EARLY MEDIEVAL CHESTER;

Map Sources

 * Burdett (1794):
 * Swire (1830);
 * Greenwood (1819);